Video?Spot on. He walked over immovable riders first ankle and ran over the second one ON bike. The guy he was following DIDN'T do that.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Video?Spot on. He walked over immovable riders first ankle and ran over the second one ON bike. The guy he was following DIDN'T do that.
First a mechanical and then held up behind a crash if my inside UAE sources are correct.
I hope @Landeirovic can confirm.
I think Ulrich is more likely?Can't find statistics online for most days spent in white Jersey, I'm assuming it is Andy Schleck? How far behind is Tadej?
I always forget about Ulrich and the white Jersey because he looked so mature/massive when he broke through. Quintana is probably up there as well.I think Ulrich is more likely?
I think Ullrich had it something like three timesThey didn't have a jersey for the young rider classification for some years, don't think Ullrich ever had it. Think maybe the first year the white jersey was back was when Denis Menchov won the competition.
Anaemic mountain stages? If you really want to race, first opportunity is on Saturday and its a great one. Can be total carnage if Ineos and Movistar wants to. Plenty of opportunities.I fear we won't see him go all out in the mountains, just following the best of the rest like Armstrong in 2005. With a fully fit Roglič, this would have been a great Tour, despite the anaemic mountain stages.
Compare Saturday with the two previous uses of Romme. Same for the rest, except Ventoux.Anaemic mountain stages?
Oh so theres not one more climb, now they cant attack.... what. This finale will always be super hard if the riders wants to do that.Compare Saturday with the two previous uses of Romme. Same for the rest, except Ventoux.
Let me know if you want to have a mature discussion of what significance the route has. I'm sure you too can tell the difference between what different mountain stages have to offer, and how different editions offer more proper racing than others.Oh so theres not one more climb, now they cant attack.... what. This finale will always be super hard if the riders wants to do that.
I know what difference it has, and I dont think the mountain stages are anaemic for Tour standards. Its not like this particular stage we are discussing is miles easier than previous ones at all, and they even included a decently hard pass just before Romme this year. Rome/Colombiere was the queen stage of 2009, and is not this year - not every inclusion of that particular combo needs a big chunk of climbing before, necessarily, although the more the better obviously.Let me know if you want to have a mature discussion of what significance the route has. I'm sure you too can tell the difference between what different mountain stages have to offer, and how different editions offer more proper racing than others.
The immaturity was your straw-man followed up with the dismissal that it's just down to the riders. My comment was about the overall impression of the route, and while it's part of a trend it is not constant. Mountain stages continue to get easier, and especially the ceiling of the hardest stage is lower than ever. That's not nitpicking on a singular stage, that's a judgement on the whole route -- not compared to an idealised route that I could draw, but compared to the other routes of the Tour over the years.I know what difference it has, and I dont think the mountain stages are anaemic for Tour standards. Its not like this particular stage we are discussing is miles easier than previous ones at all, and they even included a decently hard pass just before Romme this year. Rome/Colombiere was the queen stage of 2009, and is not this year - not every inclusion of that particular combo needs a big chunk of climbing before, necessarily, although the more the better obviously.
The route isnt original, I dont really care. The two Pyreneen stages could easily have made been harder, and thats about the only negative thing amount the mountain stages to me. They are too similar, lots of flat before - agree. But I dont wanna sit here and nitpick every god damn mountain stage, although every stage obviously in theory could have made better. But they always can, cant they
But just because I dont think they are anaemic doesnt make me immature or whatever. My point still stands - on Saturday, if they REALLY want to, it will be an amazing race. The route isnt easy before the 3 last climbs, and the last climb makes it 50 km of up and down in the final.