Big Doopie
BANNED
Tbf, I did say it was a bad comparison. But I’ll pass some time lightly defending it anyways.
Pogacar and Contador = GT prodigies who show panache and love to attack, while being good at climbs and ITTs. Pogi obviously better at classics by a lot, but let’s see if Pogi wins 9 GTs.
Vingo and Froome both exploded out of obscurity into dominance without the early promise of a Remco or Pogi.
Remco and Nibali was the biggest stretch but he’s the third of the big group who is more classics and less Gt oriented of the other two and considered less of a proven climber (although both Nibali in 2014 Tour and Remco in Vuelta would argue against that general assessment). Remco is better than Nibali at this point.
I know you have clinic based reasons to dislike Contador, but, honestly, I’m not sure how you can be so adamant about some in one direction and some in the other.
All good.
I also realize you were discussing style and form and not necessarily strength/class. Nibali is indeed the closest to Remco because he is the only one who could win one day races as well. Then again Pog does that and contador never did.
Everything is relative:
Froome > Nibali > Contador > Armstrong (by far!) as far as I am concerned. Timetable of successes matters. Where in the history of cycling their greatest successes took place etc. But one can have doubts about all.
But none have anything like the class of either Pog or Remco. Vingo is up for debate as he may end up being a more standard GT winner rather than the other two who appear more precocious, all around and, frankly, exciting.
Last edited: