No, because he's not at 70%.So, if pogacar did 6.3 w/kg during 18 min climb on volta a andalucia at 70% of his best shape, it means that if at 100% he can do 10.71 w/kg during 18 min?
I know that. Ridiculous statement by gianneti.No, because he's not at 70%.
Giannetti is as slick (look it up in the Urban Dictionary) as they get, even better than Bruyneel.I know that. Ridiculous statemente by gianneti.
So, if pogacar did 6.3 w/kg during 18 min climb on volta a andalucia at 70% of his best shape, it means that if at 100% he can do 10.71 w/kg during 18 min?
Those percentages are just numbers taken from a**. By saying 70% Giantetti means that there's still a considerable room for improvement but speaking in pure watts language he's probably at 95% at least.
Help, G is turning into Quinn Simmons!!
I see you guys interpret 70% a share that begins at zero. Well that really would be ridiculous. Surely 70% tells us where he is on the scale beginning at his winter off-form level and ending at his peak TDF form. So if his lowest w/kg is 5.5 and highest is 6.5, then 70% would be 6.2. Which is where he is at
It’s still ridiculous to talk about percents but much less ridiculous if you talk in relative terms.
Smart move by Pogi to avoid MVDP at SB. Pogi has 10 times the class of a rider like VGG - he'll pummel him at Paris-Nice and send a message about the TDF. MVDP looked extremely strong at Hooogerheide, and if things have gone smoothly over the last few weeks he will be in full beast mode at SB - knife to a gunfight and Pogi finds himself in the pain closet.
So he has 1000% the class of VGG. Currently should be at 700% though.Smart move by Pogi to avoid MVDP at SB. Pogi has 10 times the class of a rider like VGG
So he has 1000% the class of VGG. Currently should be at 700% though.
People also askWho is VGG?
jonas VinGeGaard?
People also ask
What is a VGG?
What is VGG? VGG stands for Visual Geometry Group; it is a standard deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture with multiple layers. The “deep” refers to the number of layers with VGG-16 or VGG-19 consisting of 16 and 19 convolutional layers.
You know, @tobydawq, you are allowed to google such simple terms yourself instead of burdening others.
Smart move by Pogi to avoid MVDP at SB. Pogi has 10 times the class of a rider like VGG - he'll pummel him at Paris-Nice and send a message about the TDF. MVDP looked extremely strong at Hooogerheide, and if things have gone smoothly over the last few weeks he will be in full beast mode at SB - knife to a gunfight and Pogi finds himself in the pain closet.
Bet the house on Roglic TDF winner and win twelve houses...thank me laterSome interesting trivia:
TdF odds:
Flandres odds:
According to the odds Pog is #1 favourite (or co-favourite) at both TdF and Flandres. We may not see anything like this in our lifetimes again (at least not with another rider).
Bit surprising, is it just the consistency factor for TdF or is he just a more popular bet than Vingegaard? And still not convinced he should be favorite over MVdP or Wout in Flanders, especially if they both race it.Some interesting trivia:
TdF odds:
Flandres odds:
According to the odds Pog is #1 favourite (or co-favourite) at both TdF and Flandres. We may not see anything like this in our lifetimes again (at least not with another rider).
It's less about who is better and more about what the popular narratives are for Pogacar in these races. For RVV, this narrative is that he was stronger than MvdP. WvA not being there and MvdP having a questionable buildup are easier to ignore. For the Tour that narrative is super clearly that he got *** by tactics on Granon and that's the sole reason he lost.Bit surprising, is it just the consistency factor for TdF or is he just a more popular bet than Vingegaard? And still not convinced he should be favorite over MVdP or Wout in Flanders, especially if they both race it.