Teams & Riders Tadej Pogačar discussion thread

Page 654 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
No one talked about this but Pogacar climbed the 8 km stretch of Galibier in 20:48. This give us a VAM of 1676,28 m/h. If we apply the formula to w/kg (this is a big if I believe), in this stretch of 6.75%, he did 6.27 w/kg (of course draft played a huge role too but head wind was important to slow down the gc group) in 20:48 minutes! This looks godly strong specially at 2351 m (mean). At sea level, Pogacar should do something like 7 w/kg for almost 21 minutes!!! This is Contador on Verbier in a tailwind! I got stunned after seeing this number.
Must be a big difference with Vingegaard who was 7s slower
 
No one talked about this but Pogacar climbed the 8 km stretch of Galibier in 20:48. This give us a VAM of 1676,28 m/h. If we apply the formula to w/kg (this is a big if I believe), in this stretch of 6.75%, he did 6.27 w/kg (of course draft played a huge role too but head wind was important to slow down the gc group) in 20:48 minutes! This looks godly strong specially at 2351 m (mean). At sea level, Pogacar should do something like 7 w/kg for almost 21 minutes!!! This is Contador on Verbier in a tailwind! I got stunned after seeing this number.
The statement smell a lot like a Naichaca thing.
I am impressed with the fact he didn't overvalued that much this time.

Contador never did 7 w/kg on Verbier.
The calculation they do to sea level doesn't make sense.
 
The statement smell a lot like a Naichaca thing.
I am impressed with the fact he didn't overvalued that much this time.

Contador never did 7 w/kg on Verbier.
The calculation they do to sea level doesn't make sense.

Almost 6.3 w/kg for 21 minutes at 2350 m is impressive but reducing it to sea level is a hardcore job. I think some time ago someone quoted an interesting scientific article regarding this but those twitter estimations are more like mathematical fun - adjustment by almost 2.5 km is a lot and can be quite error-prone (and obviously it varies individually due to oxygen partial pressure being only one factor in the chain called organic engine).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Froome
Almost 6.3 w/kg for 21 minutes at 2350 m is impressive but reducing it to sea level is a hardcore job. I think some time ago someone quoted an interesting scientific article regarding this but those twitter estimations are more like mathematical fun - adjustment by almost 2.5 km is a lot and can be quite error-prone (and obviously it varies individually due to oxygen partial pressure being only one factor in the chain called organic engine).
It was a really good perfomance.
 
Whats up with Remco's and his love for Pogacar? just checked his IG now boy has found himself a new favourite, he has ran to Pogacar everytime with everything first days seemingly looking for a best friend. I think somone is in love with Pogacar. Just kidding btw the respect is lovely to see.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Lequack