• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Teams & Riders Tadej Pogačar discussion thread

Page 1023 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Peyroteo94

Peyroteo94

Mar 20, 2022
6,176
9,304
16,180
hayneplane said:
Mediocre is a very generous description
Click to expand...
I think it's too early.
In fact only Vingegaard has been disappointing because I expected his base level to be strong enough to beat everyone bar Pogacar in over 6/7 minutes climbs.
- Kuss is never reliable in the spring.
- Matteo has been really good just like last year.
Yates is probably undercooked and he is peaking for the Giro. Most gc riders who will target the Giro, are very underwhelming now. This is why Ayuso looks too hot IMHO.
- Keldermann is a very strange rider, we never know what to expect from him.
- Cian is what he used to be. A early peaker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan and Rule #9 apostle
H

hayneplane

Sep 4, 2017
2,785
3,136
17,180
Peyroteo94 said:
I think it's too early.
In fact only Vingegaard has been disappointing because I expected his base level to be strong enough to beat everyone bar Pogacar in over 6/7 minutes climbs.
- Kuss is never reliable in the spring.
- Matteo has been really good just like last year.
Yates is probably undercooked and he is peaking for the Giro. Most gc riders who will target the Giro, are very underwhelming now. This is why Ayuso looks too hot IMHO.
- Keldermann is a very strange rider, we never know what to expect from him.
- Cian is what he used to be. A early peaker.
Click to expand...
Tiberi and Gee are both targeting the Giro and both looked good in TA in relation to what you can expect from them. Landa and Hindley were also decent enough considering they are better 3 week racers than 1 week. It’s only the Yates brothers that have shown nothing yet and Roglic who has yet to pin on a race number this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
K

kn0s

Jul 25, 2022
376
405
3,380
hayneplane said:
Tiberi and Gee are both targeting the Giro and both looked good in TA in relation to what you can expect from them. Landa and Hindley were also decent enough considering they are better 3 week racers than 1 week. It’s only the Yates brothers that have shown nothing yet and Roglic who has yet to pin on a race number this year.
Click to expand...
Roglic has put on a number, but telling that you missed it.
 
Peyroteo94

Peyroteo94

Mar 20, 2022
6,176
9,304
16,180
Armchair Cyclist said:
And who has said anything even vaguely analogous to that?
Click to expand...
Krzysztof_O said:
MSR is the only race that Teddy keeps racing and can't win and that's why it's to attractive to many.
Click to expand...
Because this cannot be an argument to validate a opinion. It is not fair to have and maintain a route just because a rider like Pogacar can't win. If he didn't participate, all the joy of this route would be gone?
 
Krzysztof_O

Krzysztof_O

Jul 7, 2013
6,002
11,419
23,180
Peyroteo94 said:
Because this cannot be an argument to validate a opinion. It is not fair to have and maintain a route just because a rider like Pogacar can't win. If he didn't participate, all the joy of this route would be gone?
Click to expand...

I've already expressed my opinion: MSR is the most attractive race in terms of options to win by various types of riders. As for my previous comment, it wasn't anti-Pogacar but anti-dominance. MSR probably looks more attractive nowadays because it's the only race that the modern cannibal can't win (depite trying) and therefore it has great suspence. This is a pretty normal reaction of neutral fans. BTW, make no mistake, I'd like Teddy to win MSR one day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lui98
Peyroteo94

Peyroteo94

Mar 20, 2022
6,176
9,304
16,180
Krzysztof_O said:
I've already expressed my opinion: MSR is the most attractive race in terms of options to win by various types of riders. As for my previous comment, it wasn't anti-Pogacar but anti-dominance. MSR probably looks more attractive nowadays because it's the only race that the modern cannibal can't win (depite trying) and therefore it has great suspence. This is a pretty normal reaction of neutral fans. BTW, make no mistake, I'd like Teddy to win MSR one day.
Click to expand...
I agree but with Manie this wouldn't change and the race would be more entertaining for a longer period of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salvarani
S

Salvarani

Oct 15, 2017
14,647
15,442
28,180
Peyroteo94 said:
I agree but with Manie this wouldn't change and the race would be more entertaining for a longer period of time.
Click to expand...
It has also been in the race before, so it wouldnt change much at all. Could see the organiser adding it, in the future. Then they could probably remove it again at some point. Like this race has done that sort of stuff throughout its history. Far less than the other monuments. It wouldnt be strange at all.
 
Last edited:
Armchair Cyclist

Armchair Cyclist

Moderator
Mar 22, 2010
13,631
9,176
28,180
Peyroteo94 said:
Because this cannot be an argument to validate a opinion. It is not fair to have and maintain a route just because a rider like Pogacar can't win. If he didn't participate, all the joy of this route would be gone?
Click to expand...
But you were trying to equate it with fundamentally distorting the very nature of a long established and successful event.

Which nobody has proposed, in terms of the Tour or any other event, with the purpose of preventing Pogacar from winning.

They indeed should not change the Giro to 21 sprint stages so that Milan can win it. The proposal would be grotesque should anyone make it. But they are not.


You seem to be accusing them of maintaining the route just because a rider like Pogacar can't win. (Nibali says hello) Have you any evidence that this is the sole motivation for not changing? Is that any different from claiming that they have maintained mountains in Il Lombardia "just because a rider like Milan can't win"?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: QueenStagiaire and Berniece
A

AmRacer

Sep 1, 2023
3,085
3,488
11,180
Armchair Cyclist said:
But you were trying to equate it with fundamentally distorting the very nature of a long established and successful event.

Which nobody has proposed, in terms of the Tour or any other event, with the purpose of preventing Pogacar from winning.

They indeed should not change the Giro to 21 sprint stages so that Milan can win it. The proposal would be grotesque should anyone make it. But they are not.
Click to expand...
100 km flat TT so Remco can win the Tour.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Salvarani
Peyroteo94

Peyroteo94

Mar 20, 2022
6,176
9,304
16,180
Armchair Cyclist said:
But you were trying to equate it with fundamentally distorting the very nature of a long established and successful event.

Which nobody has proposed, in terms of the Tour or any other event, with the purpose of preventing Pogacar from winning.

They indeed should not change the Giro to 21 sprint stages so that Milan can win it. The proposal would be grotesque should anyone make it. But they are not.
Click to expand...
But it wouldn't be the first Giro changed "his nature" to increase the chance of seeing italians winning the race (Moser). Vuelta designed a route to benefit Valverde.
MSR wanted to go to Pompeiana (5 years ago) but not now. This route is not a winning formula and for that reason, they wanted to change the course 5 years ago. They only maintain this route for a reason and this is not because it is a winning formula.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salvarani
Netserk

Netserk

Apr 30, 2011
42,782
24,527
28,180
Peyroteo94 said:
But it wouldn't be the first Giro changed "his nature" to increase the chance of seeing italians winning the race (Moser). Vuelta designed a route to benefit Valverde.
MSR wanted to go to Pompeiana (5 years ago) but not now. This route is not a winning formula and for that reason, they wanted to change the course 5 years ago. They only maintain this route for a reason and this is not because it is a winning formula.
Click to expand...
11 years ago. And thank God Pompeiana never featured.

The only good thing that came from the aborted route change was the return to Via Roma from 2015.
 
Armchair Cyclist

Armchair Cyclist

Moderator
Mar 22, 2010
13,631
9,176
28,180
Peyroteo94 said:
But it wouldn't be the first Giro changed "his nature" to increase the chance of seeing italians winning the race (Moser). Vuelta designed a route to benefit Valverde.
MSR wanted to go to Pompeiana (5 years ago) but not now. This route is not a winning formula and for that reason, they wanted to change the course 5 years ago. They only maintain this route for a reason and this is not because it is a winning formula.
Click to expand...
It has been an exciting race in the last few editions: why would they change it?

And how is not changing an event from its traditional characteristics analogous to radically changing one away from its fundamental nature?
 
Peyroteo94

Peyroteo94

Mar 20, 2022
6,176
9,304
16,180
Armchair Cyclist said:
It has been an exciting race in the last few editions: why would they change it?

And how is not changing an event from its traditional characteristics analogous to radically changing one away from its fundamental nature?
Click to expand...
I can't agree with you on this one. It is like saying FW is exciting because we have 10 minutes of action.
There is no point in turning on the TV before the last 10 km in MSR and we have 4 hours of live coverage there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scribers, hayneplane and Salvarani
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom