Dude, its not comparable, it wasnt even a sport back then. Youre really struggling. Bill Russell isnt the goat of basketball for the same reasons by almost everyone, exactly the same. Besides, goat debates are just a subjective matter. Trying to turn it into a fact isn't the move man.
Half the Tour peloton this year was asked by TNT who the goat was, and 77% already answered Pog, , its more a norm than anything these days.Take a chill pill its also subjective, I dont get rattled at all if u say merckx its completely fine from a subjective preference standpoint what one value most here. But trying to turn it into a factual argument like you're doing isn't worth the time, you're comparing things that are incomparable its not hard to figure out what Pogacar does is 100x harder to achieve and its not hard to figure out Merckx won alot more.
You trying to factualize something that is subjective is just funny thats all, again the perspective and context thing, as its clearly not a factual matter but subjective.