Nope, the top 10 is much much stronger now. Merckx era was very weak in comparison.The top ten is one of the weakest ever. Weak era in that respect
Nope, the top 10 is much much stronger now. Merckx era was very weak in comparison.The top ten is one of the weakest ever. Weak era in that respect
not prime for prime, Roglic is perhaps the only one with some kind of consistency now.Mancebo?
You rate Valverde higher than Roglic in GTs for example?
Ha ha 🤣Nope, the top 10 is much much stronger now. Merckx era was very weak in comparison.
🤣 One reason is that the peloton was much weaker back then. As has been explained multiple times.Ha ha 🤣
Seriously? There were multiple tour winners in all of the early 70s tours, maybe it’s you who needs to read back.
Maybe you think Adam Yates or Richie Porte is better than Ocana or Gimondi?
I think it’s a bit of a bad argument. Today there are around, what 530 World Tour riders and around 400 Pro Conti riders. With over 900 professional riders, compared to what, maybe 50 in the days of Merckx i think it’s just logical to assume that the general level is much higher today. And that where it before would be 5 great riders from one nation there are still the same (or even more) number at a high level, but because of the general higher level and more nations around the relative level that would be enough to be a top 20 rider in the World before is now maybe equal to a top 50 rider in the World now.
No, much better🤣 One reason is that the peloton was much weaker back then. As has been explained multiple times.
Yes, very much better. That's why GC riders cannot win monuments today, except a few.No, much better
You cannot even give a reason for what you’re saying.
Look at the top ten in Indurains first win. 10th place rider never really won much.
All the rest were monument winners, tour winners, world champions, giro winners.
This is what you had in Merckx time too.
The big two now beguile the fact that the rest of the field is poor.
Even WVA would contest GTs in his prime.Yes, that's a valid point.
I was making a similar point in my mind. There is a chance that the talent pool in France and Italy (as main examples, even though France is producing supposedly top talents lately) isn't really shrinking
It's just that as you said, in the cycling of 70's, let's say, Tiberi would have been top 3 or 5 GT rider and would have naturally won GT's, elevating him in the all time ranking, today he isn't even top 10, doesn't win anything and nobody talks about him as a great rider.
However, we can't know for sure whether that's true or not, IMO.
How many tours do you think let’s say Zoetemelk would win in this era ?Yes, very much better. That's why GC riders cannot win monuments today, except a few.
Put Zoetemelk in this era he does at least as well as in his own era…Even WVA would contest GTs in his prime.
ZeroHow many tours do you think let’s say Zoetemelk would win in this era ?
I think he’d win at least one, probably more likely to win more than one due to his longevity.
NopePut Zoetemelk in this era he does at least as well as in his own era…
He’d win at least one, and dominate the Vuelta or giro if he wanted.Nope
RoglaHe’d win at least one, and dominate the Vuelta or giro if he wanted.
Levels
Primoz aint getting a win and six 2nds in the Merckx /Hinault era.Rogla
Eddy would have been competing with Mathieu.well size is important in boxing,lmaoo.and he talks about ali.champ,keep it with eddie.thye even have weight classes in fighting game,doesnot matter.im telling,juts by looking pog and eddie,its kabeem.
Put Geraint Thomas in Zoetemelk's era and he does as well as Zoetemelk.Put Zoetemelk in this era he does at least as well as in his own era…
Eddy will ride Mathieu and Pogi off his wheel, after he boxed their ears off.Eddy was supposed to be a good boxer in his youth , now that we bring it up again.
He will ride vdp and Tadej off his wheel, then box their ears off.
One and only goat, the wild bull of Brabant
You know, he could pull one out there sure.Put Geraint Thomas in Zoetemelk's era and he does as well as Zoetemelk.
A Kenyan born and raised rider has won 4 Tours, 1 Giro and 2 VueltaThat the riders who won them , would still be winning them now.
Are you just going to ignore how poor international riders have been at the tour? And classics?
How can you argue that the peloton is higher quality now? It makes no difference how many countries are in the peloton if they lack talent to win.
This talent that you say is everywhere, where is it?
*British*A Kenyan born and raised rider has won 4 Tours, 1 Giro and 2 Vuelta
