Teams & Riders Tadej Pogačar discussion thread

Page 1493 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Charlyghoul

BANNED
Jul 19, 2025
746
528
3,080
Mancebo?
You rate Valverde higher than Roglic in GTs for example?
not prime for prime, Roglic is perhaps the only one with some kind of consistency now.
look at the top ten in the 2000s, you had the same guys, Valverde, Sastre, Kloden, Mancebo, Ulrich, Pererio.
The gc contenders were stronger even if they couldn’t usually compete for the top one or two places.
 

Charlyghoul

BANNED
Jul 19, 2025
746
528
3,080
Nope, the top 10 is much much stronger now. Merckx era was very weak in comparison.
Ha ha 🤣
Seriously? There were multiple tour winners in all of the early 70s tours, maybe it’s you who needs to read back.
Maybe you think Adam Yates or Richie Porte is better than Ocana or Gimondi?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AmRacer
Sep 1, 2023
4,830
5,014
14,180
Ha ha 🤣
Seriously? There were multiple tour winners in all of the early 70s tours, maybe it’s you who needs to read back.
Maybe you think Adam Yates or Richie Porte is better than Ocana or Gimondi?
🤣 One reason is that the peloton was much weaker back then. As has been explained multiple times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Jul 8, 2017
2,275
2,960
17,180
I think it’s a bit of a bad argument. Today there are around, what 530 World Tour riders and around 400 Pro Conti riders. With over 900 professional riders, compared to what, maybe 50 in the days of Merckx i think it’s just logical to assume that the general level is much higher today. And that where it before would be 5 great riders from one nation there are still the same (or even more) number at a high level, but because of the general higher level and more nations around the relative level that would be enough to be a top 20 rider in the World before is now maybe equal to a top 50 rider in the World now.

Yes, that's a valid point.
I was making a similar point in my mind. There is a chance that the talent pool in France and Italy (as main examples, even though France is producing supposedly top talents lately) isn't really shrinking
It's just that as you said, in the cycling of 70's, let's say, Tiberi would have been top 3 or 5 GT rider and would have naturally won GT's, elevating him in the all time ranking, today he isn't even top 10, doesn't win anything and nobody talks about him as a great rider.

However, we can't know for sure whether that's true or not, IMO.
 

Charlyghoul

BANNED
Jul 19, 2025
746
528
3,080
🤣 One reason is that the peloton was much weaker back then. As has been explained multiple times.
No, much better
You cannot even give a reason for what you’re saying.
Look at the top ten in Indurains first win. 10th place rider never really won much.
All the rest were monument winners, tour winners, world champions, giro winners.
This is what you had in Merckx time too.

The big two now beguile the fact that the rest of the field is poor.
 
Sep 1, 2023
4,830
5,014
14,180
No, much better
You cannot even give a reason for what you’re saying.
Look at the top ten in Indurains first win. 10th place rider never really won much.
All the rest were monument winners, tour winners, world champions, giro winners.
This is what you had in Merckx time too.

The big two now beguile the fact that the rest of the field is poor.
Yes, very much better. That's why GC riders cannot win monuments today, except a few.
 
Mar 20, 2022
13,263
18,019
22,180
Yes, that's a valid point.
I was making a similar point in my mind. There is a chance that the talent pool in France and Italy (as main examples, even though France is producing supposedly top talents lately) isn't really shrinking
It's just that as you said, in the cycling of 70's, let's say, Tiberi would have been top 3 or 5 GT rider and would have naturally won GT's, elevating him in the all time ranking, today he isn't even top 10, doesn't win anything and nobody talks about him as a great rider.

However, we can't know for sure whether that's true or not, IMO.
Even WVA would contest GTs in his prime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Charlyghoul

BANNED
Jul 19, 2025
746
528
3,080
Yes, very much better. That's why GC riders cannot win monuments today, except a few.
How many tours do you think let’s say Zoetemelk would win in this era ?
I think he’d win at least one, probably more likely to win more than one due to his longevity.
 
May 22, 2024
514
723
3,780
well size is important in boxing,lmaoo.and he talks about ali.champ,keep it with eddie.thye even have weight classes in fighting game,doesnot matter.im telling,juts by looking pog and eddie,its kabeem.
 
Sep 1, 2023
4,830
5,014
14,180
Eddy was supposed to be a good boxer in his youth , now that we bring it up again.
He will ride vdp and Tadej off his wheel, then box their ears off.
One and only goat, the wild bull of Brabant
Eddy will ride Mathieu and Pogi off his wheel, after he boxed their ears off.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan
Sep 4, 2017
3,535
4,150
19,180
That the riders who won them , would still be winning them now.
Are you just going to ignore how poor international riders have been at the tour? And classics?
How can you argue that the peloton is higher quality now? It makes no difference how many countries are in the peloton if they lack talent to win.
This talent that you say is everywhere, where is it?
A Kenyan born and raised rider has won 4 Tours, 1 Giro and 2 Vuelta
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan