Name a clean cyclist in history who turns up every race day in perfect condition and on every terrain blitzs everyone.
Could you imagine contador beating boonen or cancellara on the stones or Armstrong beating museeuw it's crazy.
That's the thing that bothers me the most about his fans and all observers of the sport who are staying quiet right now, if they're not outright cheering him on in support.
Imagine the outrage if Froomey had gone to Roubaix 10 years ago and just smashed the likes of Degenkolb, Štybar, Sagan, and only been beaten by Van Avermaet because he went
too fast in a corner on the cobbles. Just imagine for a second what people would have said about that. Nobody would have even questioned for a second if that was legitimate.
Or let's turn it around for a second, imagine if Nils Politt or Mads Pedersen turned up at the Tour this summer and absolutely destroyed riders like Landa, Yates & Yates, Ayuso, or Carlos Rodríguez in the GC. Who, in their right mind, would believe that as legitimate?
Nibali tried pivoting towards the cobbles, and in return, he had to
completely and utterly sacrifice his GC-hopes in that season. Nibali didn't even finish in the top-20 of Dauphiné in 2018 when he went in on De Ronde. He was beaten by Léo Vincent, and you're absolutely allowed to right now say:
"Who the hell is Léo Vincent?" Similarly, Wiggo was nowhere near being a GC-contender in 2014 when he had his best year at Roubaix, finishing almost half an hour down on Contador in Tirreno-Adriatico right along the likes of Cancellara and Stijn Devolder.
For 30 years, it's been widely agreed that the sport has become so professionalized that you
cannot compete in
all terrains as used to be the case. Riders are specialized to such a degree that you just
cannot be the best at everything. You can be very good at a lot of things, think of Van Avermaet, Sagan or Cort, but you just
cannot climb with the featherweights in the Alps one day and then outride the heavyweights on the cobbles the next day. In fact, I'd say that Wiggins' career - and the same goes for G - perfectly embodies the concept that it's one or the other.
But then this guy comes along, all logic completely flies out the window, and
*** nobody is questioning it? Just what the ***?