- Jun 22, 2010
- 5,021
- 1,155
- 20,680
There’s been a lot of coping here the last few years. Hope you guys are ready to cope for a few more.
Aren't you the one coping? With the fact that Pogacar is doped as ***.There’s been a lot of coping here the last few years. Hope you guys are ready to cope for a few more.
Ah apologies then I misunderstood. You're right to point those out of course. It only makes it more clear how a rotten culture is still there. Another one is Steven de Jongh of LidlTrek. But there's obviously plenty. But it should not justify it, especially not the likes such as Gianetti.It's not about who is worse. My point was that team staff within professional cycling is filled with personnel that have doped and I brought UAE main rival Visma as a example. Another example is EF education general manager Vaugthers is also an admitted doper.
Indeed big difference between a self admitter and a Gianetti who sues his doctor who saved his life but exposed him.Also, Niermann was not caught. He self admitted. That's why he is better than Gianetti. Great? No. Better? Definitely. People with such comments around Niermann and Gianetti are the biggest supporters of Omerta.
Cycling won't make that mistake again. Pog, Remco, Jonas, MVdP et al have brought never seen before worldwide attention, money to the sport again, after being rock bottom after Lance. Lance was a household name but him only. Things like the Netflix show and the increased TV coverage and media coverage is giving lesser names publicity, fame and money that superstars of previous eras could only dream of.
They're all too big to fall and there is too much at stake to go prodding. I'd imagine there is someone tapping them on the shoulder to keep it under reins a little but the show must go on. A few no hopers might get popped just to keep up the facade.
Thanks for making me laugh.For all of Lance's bad traits at least he only had eyes for Le Tour. I'm also almost certain that Lance would never be able to win the Ronde or PR unless he fully focused on it sacrificing the tour.
Pogacar on the other hand competes in EVERY sub discipline in road cycling, never having a bad day and almost always winning.
I hope Tadej comes to CX so Iserbyt can stamp on his rear derailleur 🤣
Is there anyone else dominating all year around in every road cycling discipline?
If the secong coming of Christ happens... Blablablablabla...Now just a question.
That's true in general, though, and wouldn't be any different without Pogačar.All the apologists for Pogacar can give us any amount of excuses and explanations for Pogacar’s performance levels. Superior genetics. Superior training. Superior feeding strategies (lol). Zone 2. Seated attack yoga techniques. Yada yada yada. It can all be used to justify, in some people’s eyes, the most ridiculous, credulity busting performances. However, nothing he does will ever remove the stain represented by his affiliation with Mauro Gianetti. No amount of brilliant white sports washing (copyright UAE) will ever take it away. Every win, every performance will have to be accompanied with that huge asterisk. And with it the eternal doubt that any of it was real.
So after Contador you decided to take a sure bet for fandom? I was a big fan of Alberto, it started when he was fighting the chicken and got all my respect after beating Pharmastrong. So for me it's really hard to understand why are you know supporting pog, who is way worse in the cheating part than Lance ever was. Alberto wasn't clean either, but he was not even in the same solar system than teddy, lol. He was human!
I remember when that argument was used against Lance.Mate you can't compare Lance to Pogacar. Lance was good once a year, not every bloody raceday for the last 2 years in GT's, classics, week stage races ect.
Cycling won't make that mistake again. Pog, Remco, Jonas, MVdP et al have brought never seen before worldwide attention, money to the sport again, after being rock bottom after Lance. Lance was a household name but him only. Things like the Netflix show and the increased TV coverage and media coverage is giving lesser names publicity, fame and money that superstars of previous eras could only dream of.
They're all too big to fall and there is too much at stake to go prodding. I'd imagine there is someone tapping them on the shoulder to keep it under reins a little but the show must go on. A few no hopers might get popped just to keep up the facade.
Mate you can't compare Lance to Pogacar. Lance was good once a year, not every bloody raceday for the last 2 years in GT's, classics, week stage races ect.
If the secong coming of Christ happens... Blablablablabla...
No? I just don't believe in miracles.So you believe everyone has the same level of talent 🤣
Yes.What if it's gene doping? In the upcoming decades cyclists(and everything else of course) will be decided by who got the money (and dubious morals) to biologically engineer their offspring, who's to say it doesn't already happen atleast on a moderate scale?
No? I just don't believe in miracles.
One with less wins overall and from less diverse races than he has now. It is the age of specialization and professionalism after all.Now just a question.
If a cycling talent that only comes every 20-50 years appears. What kind of palmares would you expect ?
No, it’s not true in general and it isn’t fair to everyone else to say so. Gianetti isnt comparable to anyone else in his position in terms of his dark history, and neither is Pogacar in terms of his quite frankly quite ludicrous endurance and performance levels across every type of race. They’re both complete outliers. And they just happen to both be joined at the hip at the same time. Coincidence? I don’t think so.That's true in general, though, and wouldn't be any different without Pogačar.
It is no miracles. It is called being an all time great talent.
Give Pantani 10x his doping, he would still not finish Paris Roubaix within top 30. Not the same talent.
Name one rider that wouldn't give you doubts if they won the Tour.No, it’s not true in general and it isn’t fair to everyone else to say so. Gianetti isnt comparable to anyone else in his position in terms of his dark history, and neither is Pogacar in terms of his quite frankly quite ludicrous endurance and performance levels across every type of race. They’re both complete outliers. And they just happen to both be joined at the hip at the same time. Coincidence? I don’t think so.
??? Winning the Tour without being doped?Name one rider that wouldn't give you doubts if they won the Tour.
Give him gene doping/motor assistance and he would. Sure I can't say for certain that's whats going on but if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck.
