The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Hmm seems he himself just feels he had an off day mostly.
What else should he say? That his GT winning days are over and he should aim for the monuments?
Nah But if he for example knew he had a hunger or water knoch or was out because of the heat he could have pointed to that specifically. Or he could have said it was the heat. But he didn't.What else should he say? That his GT winning days are over and he should aim for the monuments?
4 km of weakness in three years of GTs doesn't make him ok actually. I look forward to tomorrow.And I was totally wrong. Jumbo's new superman just annihilated Pogacar like they were in an episode of Dragon Ball Z.
But, Pogacar just earned himself a spot on my "I think this guy is actually okay" list. I like riders who show a human side, i.e. first time I've ever felt this rider was more relatable.
I really don't like terminators.
If he actually bonked, that will absolutely negatively impact his ability to recover tomorrow.I don't think it were the efforts of the days before, he was doing rather fine the whole day except for the last 8km when he started to show some problems. Seems more like a hunger bonk imo. and if that is the case, he should probably recover fine by tomorrow. If it is something else, we should see him fading more tomorrow i believe.
Edit: i find it hard to believe it is a conditional issue... with all the zone 2 riding he does.
looks bad when he is losing looks bad if he would win; got itTomorrow could be the perfect scenario for an all-out battle on l'Alpe. If pog is able to smash everyone, that would look very bad. At best he should be able to almost match the best from today.
I've said it about Simon Yates at the Giro. Teams have to be telling their riders to give away zero info about weakness or issues in post race interviews. It can completely be used against you. I think an untraced Covid infection is a distinct possibility. The tests arent infallible and at this level of performance the slightest diversion of your body towards fighting an infection could have an impact.
Maybe some top fuel is needed for Pogi to recover and drop a watt bomb.
You don't actually know much about cycling or sports physiology do youlooks bad when he is losing looks bad if he would win; got it
I wonder if the police raids on Bahrain had some effect on other teams preparations
4 km of weakness in three years of GTs doesn't make him ok actually. I look forward to tomorrow.
The lead vingo has on pog can evaporate very quickly. I'm pretty sure if he could have done more and really attacked pog again, he would have. It's not like this is a scripted play (I'm not that cynical)Jumbo Visma have succeeded in making me a Pogacar fan in this TdF. That's quite a achievement right there. If someone had told me this a month ago I would have laughed. I will cheer for the Pog from now on, in full awareness of who his backers are & what he is. A bit like Ullrich 20 years ago.
It's the cynicism of creating Vingegaard in a lab to take down another lab project (Pog) which I find completely gross, so if I have to choose sides, I go with the original mutant. As I'm not a shareholder of any of the sponsors & I don't treat sport too seriously (it's just 'sport'), the sort of military approach Jumbo has in this TdF with a almost clinical (pun intended) smash Pogacar at all costs approach = me jumping off their train.
I can't support that. Vingegaard is even tangibly a worse rider than Pogacar (yes, I'm talking basic bike handling, spatial awareness & even something as subjective as his style on the bike which is a bit of Froome combined with Chicken). He's Rasmussen, the return. This time with upgraded watts & rouleur abilities.
I bet his doctors are very proud. I also think he's literally stronger than Pog right now, i.e. he was so easy on the Alpe D'Huez & just 'floated around' behind Pog's attacks. Surreal.
The lead vingo has on pog can evaporate very quickly. I'm pretty sure if he could have done more and really attacked pog again, he would have. It's not like this is a scripted play (I'm not that cynical)
Anywho, I'm interested to see how this arms race plays out this year. So much ridonkulous today and yesterday. The watt bombs are just priceless. And pog screwing it up a bit yesterday definitely does not make me a fan. On a different note, one of his weaknesses at this juncture might be hubris (or perhaps uncertainty)
It also suggests you've created quite a bit of your own narrative around it, past the suspicious physical performances and dodgy team managers.If he has a weakness, it's his team. Not in the sense he has weak teammates (that's one issue) but clearly because they probably never expected Vingegaard to be so strong. Pogacar was cruising around France last week without realizing there was such a crazy mutant rider in this TdF on Jumbo's team, hiding behind Roglic. I bet Gianetti never expected that one.
I'm just super salty (I am salt incarnate) because Jumbo crapped all over the 'romanticism' (yes, even with dopage involved) of the narrative which demanded Roglic get his revenge for 2020. It turns out Jumbo wanted their revenge way more so they built themselves a nouveau mutant to do the job they didn't trust Roglic to do.
I mean in my mind they've literally doped up a new super responder to correct the 2020 result. That's cold, very cold.
However, if you substitute Contador for Pogacar and Froome (and Sky) for Vingegaard (and Jumbo), then perhaps he does have a narrative point.It also suggests you've created quite a bit of your own narrative around it, past the suspicious physical performances and dodgy team managers.
I think one of the worst things about doping and cheating in sport is how it exacerbates cynicism (although it's totally understandable).
It also suggests you've created quite a bit of your own narrative around it, past the suspicious physical performances and dodgy team managers.
I think one of the worst things about doping and cheating in sport is how it exacerbates cynicism (although it's totally understandable).
It's also partly because UAE have not demonstrated tactical/strategic superiority, or bellowed on about marginal gains (actually, I have found UAE to be pretty silent). Their team is OK, but the collective does not seem to be as strong as the sum of the parts would suggest, whereas Sky turned so many into superhuman robots and let's be frank, Jumbo has indicated they were going to copy Sky for quite some time, so not really a surprise.Interesting commentary, although I understand Ripper's point as well. I felt the same way about Froome and Sky, which took the "romanticism" out of Contador. At the same time, however, Contador had ridden for Saiz, Bruyneel and Riis, so part of my "romantic" take on Contador was wrapped up in that he was the first to really cause havoc and destruction with style since Pantani, at least for me. At the same time, I felt the same way about Froome and Sky then as you do about Vingegaard and Jumbo now: laboratory and robotic insanity passed off for marginal gains and (unknown by others) performance science expertise. It was like a James Bond 007 narrative of clean good guys, fighting with superior know-how, the rotten Continental system rife with doping that had plummeted the sport to its nadir. It was just too much to take, really.
The similarities with the Jumbo narrative of today, as you describe it, are of course strikingly similar. At the same time, Pog's case is also far from transparent. Yet, somehow, UAE doesn't come across as imperious as Sky then or Jumbo today. Perhaps it's because of the Italian component that it still resonates, rightly or wrongly, as romantically "old school," as it was with Mercatone Uno and Pantani of yore.
What I meant about "old school" was simply having a bunch of lads willing to ride their hearts and souls out for an especially prodigious leader, however on the normal program they are. By contrast with Sky you had a bunch of engineered bots deployed to cower the field into utter submission. Then unleash the lab-designed leader's irresistable power to blow the remaining would-be challengers into oblivion. There is something unnatural about it, whilst claiming to be cleaner than clean. What happend was the greatest of heists. A super budget affording a team-wide advanced program of performance science and chemistry, allowed a donkey to vanquish a thoroughbred.It's also partly because UAE have not demonstrated tactical/strategic superiority, or bellowed on about marginal gains (actually, I have found UAE to be pretty silent). Their team is OK, but the collective does not seem to be as strong as the sum of the parts would suggest, whereas Sky turned so many into superhuman robots and let's be frank, Jumbo has indicated they were going to copy Sky for quite some time, so not really a surprise.
Personally I don't find pog as fascinating as Contador. I think pog and vingo are both lab enhanced up the ying yang I am quite skeptical about pro sports performances, but not yet a cynical person about it.