The idea that current cycling, exposure, participation and money involved are greater than Armstrong era is a stretch.. There was a dark running joke that Pogacar getting paid between @6.5-8 million Euros per year, still have Armstrong, then and now still highest paid cyclist.Good post but not sure about this part? Armstrong’s confession hurt cycling for a few years but it’s back bigger and “better” than ever - look at the commercialization of the sport, that can overcome bad press and Armstrong's case proves that.
Plus, in choosing not to address the problem of Gianetti the UCI would be opening itself up to much bigger trouble in the future. Especially if they are choosing to look the other way with an Eastern European when there are rival riders, teams and their sponsors losing potentially many millions of USD or EUR with Pog's dominance.
I went to the DDR in some bizarre pursuit of some of my earliest heros..Olaf Ludwig being one. Went to a very humble velodrome and training facility, so I was a little let down about legendary DDR state sponsored sports.. Training facilities in Belgium, West Germany and Luxembourg much more impressive.
As far as the Giannetti" problem " it doesn't exist. Most of the premise people type in is completely crazy and counterintuitive. Don't know if the saying crosses cultures but " if it ain't broke don't fix it " looks to be philosophy UCI and upper echelons of cycling look to be following. Past is the past, and if anyone was punished for something, years ago, it's over and done.