- Dec 28, 2010
- 4,415
- 3,483
- 21,180
Only Simoni didn't bother.Yep saw the blond hair as well. Basically outing himself as a doper
Only Simoni didn't bother.Yep saw the blond hair as well. Basically outing himself as a doper
Soon he will appear in the Epstein files as well, together with the other crypto bros.
You aren't reading wrong, though it depends on the effort, 'VAM' alone doesn't really mean much without context of climb type/duration. Pogacar and even some of Vingegaard's efforts were close and sometimes exceeding Pantani/Riis/Mig on the climbs, rather than the '10%-15% less' than he thinks here.
Pogacar's fresh FTP over an hour is at least close to 7 w/kg, form/weight dependant ofc.
Tl;dr Attia is a charlatan, no more qualifications in exercise physiology/related than anyone on here (zero), his speciality is the classic 'longevity medicine'. I'd also expect most people on here to have a better grasp of the basic concepts. Having said that I think it's good Pogacar is doing this sort of interview, though just wish he would've chosen someone different.
1800 times is absurd.Funny you should mention this, not quite, however if this forum has one use it does call out snake oil salesmen early. People on here were saying San Milan was full of *** years before it came commonplace.
Not accusing Pogacar of anything to do with it of course but he does need better advice on choosing his friends.
Peter Attia mentioned in the Epstein files 1800 times;
I'm a little confused about the hair thing. Not that it doesn't do what you say, but more at what point would the ITA actually do hair testing? It doesn't seem to be listed as a routine method that they use (their website says, "The ITA collect urine, blood serum, blood ABP (for an Athlete Biological Passport (ABP)) and Dried Blood Spot (DBS) samples". So why would Pogacar bother bleaching his hair to cover up his (supposed) doping if no-one is actually going to be asking him for a hair sample?I hear you but (quick ai explanation)
Bleaching or heavily treating blond hair can reduce drug metabolite concentrations by 40-80%, potentially allowing users to evade detection in hair follicle tests. The process damages the hair shaft, causing substances to leach out. Natural, light-colored hair also has a lower, poorer incorporation rate of substances compared to darker hair.
So i do see it as a possible tell.
It doesn't sound like he has any reason to be anxious about hair sampling though? Sorry, I find so many things are presented as "gotchas" in The Clinic and then when I look into them further there doesn't seem to be any substance to them.almost never. I don't think hair samples are accepted by wada. but non-damaged hair provides long term evidence. better safe than sorry. that and belief. Anxious ppl try to cover all their bases.
Grifters gonna grift...Peter Attia mentioned in the Epstein files 1800 times;
