- Dec 28, 2010
- 4,595
- 3,658
- 21,180
Only Simoni didn't bother.Yep saw the blond hair as well. Basically outing himself as a doper
Only Simoni didn't bother.Yep saw the blond hair as well. Basically outing himself as a doper
Soon he will appear in the Epstein files as well, together with the other crypto bros.
You aren't reading wrong, though it depends on the effort, 'VAM' alone doesn't really mean much without context of climb type/duration. Pogacar and even some of Vingegaard's efforts were close and sometimes exceeding Pantani/Riis/Mig on the climbs, rather than the '10%-15% less' than he thinks here.
Pogacar's fresh FTP over an hour is at least close to 7 w/kg, form/weight dependant ofc.
Tl;dr Attia is a charlatan, no more qualifications in exercise physiology/related than anyone on here (zero), his speciality is the classic 'longevity medicine'. I'd also expect most people on here to have a better grasp of the basic concepts. Having said that I think it's good Pogacar is doing this sort of interview, though just wish he would've chosen someone different.
1800 times is absurd.Funny you should mention this, not quite, however if this forum has one use it does call out snake oil salesmen early. People on here were saying San Milan was full of *** years before it came commonplace.
Not accusing Pogacar of anything to do with it of course but he does need better advice on choosing his friends.
Peter Attia mentioned in the Epstein files 1800 times;
I'm a little confused about the hair thing. Not that it doesn't do what you say, but more at what point would the ITA actually do hair testing? It doesn't seem to be listed as a routine method that they use (their website says, "The ITA collect urine, blood serum, blood ABP (for an Athlete Biological Passport (ABP)) and Dried Blood Spot (DBS) samples". So why would Pogacar bother bleaching his hair to cover up his (supposed) doping if no-one is actually going to be asking him for a hair sample?I hear you but (quick ai explanation)
Bleaching or heavily treating blond hair can reduce drug metabolite concentrations by 40-80%, potentially allowing users to evade detection in hair follicle tests. The process damages the hair shaft, causing substances to leach out. Natural, light-colored hair also has a lower, poorer incorporation rate of substances compared to darker hair.
So i do see it as a possible tell.
It doesn't sound like he has any reason to be anxious about hair sampling though? Sorry, I find so many things are presented as "gotchas" in The Clinic and then when I look into them further there doesn't seem to be any substance to them.almost never. I don't think hair samples are accepted by wada. but non-damaged hair provides long term evidence. better safe than sorry. that and belief. Anxious ppl try to cover all their bases.
Grifters gonna grift...Peter Attia mentioned in the Epstein files 1800 times;
The bleached hair 'meme' comes from something else. I don't remember exactly what substance it was, but a lot of riders in the 90s/00s bleached their hair because the stuff they took gave them blonde patches in their hair. See the Simoni picture I posted here. I think I read that he caught some flak from other riders for not bothering to hide that particular side-effect. Don't remember if it was in the Hamilton book or here on the forum or whatever, so take it with a slight grain of salt. But the blonde patches due to doping was definitely a thing.I'm a little confused about the hair thing. Not that it doesn't do what you say, but more at what point would the ITA actually do hair testing? It doesn't seem to be listed as a routine method that they use (their website says, "The ITA collect urine, blood serum, blood ABP (for an Athlete Biological Passport (ABP)) and Dried Blood Spot (DBS) samples". So why would Pogacar bother bleaching his hair to cover up his (supposed) doping if no-one is actually going to be asking him for a hair sample?
Ohhh, got it! I wasn't watching cycling back then and not as clued up on the history of the sport.The bleached hair 'meme' comes from something else. I don't remember exactly what substance it was, but a lot of riders in the 90s/00s bleached their hair because the stuff they took gave them blonde patches in their hair. See the Simoni picture I posted here. I think I read that he caught some flak from other riders for not bothering to hide that particular side-effect. Don't remember if it was in the Hamilton book or here on the forum or whatever, so take it with a slight grain of salt. But the blonde patches due to doping was definitely a thing.
“There are two guys at the top who, in the past, facilitated doping.”
It's his job to promote the interests of his clients. PR and otherwise. Not a "good" or "bad" look when he's trying to boost the credibility of the industry he himself works in. Just obvious. Not convinced that UCI having training data would help with anything. Completely convinced they can not write regulation that would hold up in a court if the riders or teams deny it, though. I do think that all race data should be made available and I can see a world where that could be be mandated.Always a good look when the top rider’s agent says they should not be exploring using further doping tests to monitor sudden jumps in power.
The two guys have willingly crossed a line before so why would n't they do it again?Reading the cyclingnews article made me laugh:
"Former rider and commentator Jose De Cauwer is dismissive of the idea that cycling’s old mistakes could simply be replayed at the highest level today.
“I can’t imagine those two guys, Gianetti and Matxin, being so stupid as to make themselves guilty of that again,” he said."
Jose De Cauwer is certaintly not a scholar of criminal psychology. The best predictor of a future crime is having a history of doing the crime in the past.
That's just how Omerta works. De Cauwer has spent his entire life in cycling, he's not gonna burn it down post retirement.It's his job to promote the interests of his clients. PR and otherwise. Not a "good" or "bad" look when he's trying to boost the credibility of the industry he himself works in. Just obvious. Not convinced that UCI having training data would help with anything. Completely convinced they can not write regulation that would hold up in a court if the riders or teams deny it, though. I do think that all race data should be made available and I can see a world where that could be be mandated.
Reading the cyclingnews article made me laugh:
"Former rider and commentator Jose De Cauwer is dismissive of the idea that cycling’s old mistakes could simply be replayed at the highest level today.
“I can’t imagine those two guys, Gianetti and Matxin, being so stupid as to make themselves guilty of that again,” he said."
Jose De Cauwer is certaintly not a scholar of criminal psychology. The best predictor of a future crime is having a history of doing the crime in the past.
No need for critical thinking, "Now cycling has credibility"!That's just how Omerta works. De Cauwer has spent his entire life in cycling, he's not gonna burn it down post retirement.
And yes, it's just pissing in the face of people with any shred of critical thinking left in them. But then it's 2026 and critical thinking has left the building years ago
Motor anyone???? Or genuine power frommedicationporridge?
Here is the clip. People can make their own judgements. For me my opinion is clear.Just looking back at some performances from 2025 and I can't get the ride of Pogacar at Fleche Wallone. The race was nicely poised with 500m to go. About 8-10 riders were in a small group at the front. Pidcock makes a move with 500m to go. Pogi locks onto his wheel and then with 450m left Pogi blows the group apart. He leaves everyone in his wake and makes the road seem flat whilst the rest of the guys are grovelling in anguish in ones and twos. The gap he opens in that distance is massive.
Then to cap it off, with 75m to go he looks around, starts blowing his nose, swerves from left to right across the road and rolls across the line with his hands off the handlebars and arms out stretched.
Motor anyone???? Or genuine power from medication?
I sometimes watch it just for fun.Just looking back at some performances from 2025 and I can't get the ride of Pogacar at Fleche Wallone. The race was nicely poised with 500m to go. About 8-10 riders were in a small group at the front. Pidcock makes a move with 500m to go. Pogi locks onto his wheel and then with 450m left Pogi blows the group apart. He leaves everyone in his wake and makes the road seem flat whilst the rest of the guys are grovelling in anguish in ones and twos. The gap he opens in that distance is massive.
Then to cap it off, with 75m to go he looks around, starts blowing his nose, swerves from left to right across the road and rolls across the line with his hands off the handlebars and arms out stretched.
Motor anyone???? Or genuine power from medication?
Your opinion is clear? But you don't state your opinion.Here is the clip. People can make their own judgements. For me my opinion is clear.
Interestingly, thjs spring is the 10 year anniversary of femke van de dreiche getting caught with a motor. It felt as if a can of worms was opened then. And yet 10 years on, nothing.
View: https://youtu.be/g3f7ioQ7_ME?si=MRqPbb8VsGT3pWTL
Watched it. Can't see the issue. We can sometimes see what we want to see.Here is the clip. People can make their own judgements. For me my opinion is clear.
Interestingly, thjs spring is the 10 year anniversary of femke van de dreiche getting caught with a motor. It felt as if a can of worms was opened then. And yet 10 years on, nothing.
View: https://youtu.be/g3f7ioQ7_ME?si=MRqPbb8VsGT3pWTL
Indeed. I can’t get used to it.Wasn't breathing hard when he attacked, unlike the others.
And even with a motor he couldn't beat Philippe Gilbert. Must have been an incredibly hard edition of F-W.Here is the clip. People can make their own judgements. For me my opinion is clear.
Interestingly, thjs spring is the 10 year anniversary of femke van de dreiche getting caught with a motor. It felt as if a can of worms was opened then. And yet 10 years on, nothing.
View: https://youtu.be/g3f7ioQ7_ME?si=MRqPbb8VsGT3pWTL
Like I said I saw nothing that wrong. If you are much stronger that can happen (not breathe hard). He won by 10 seconds from Vauquelin and Pidcock. Interesting they can tune motors so you don't win by too much? Pog was obviously at his limits else why was he constantly looking over his shoulder?Indeed. I can’t get used to it.
I am not saying he uses a motor. Just that something is weird. Absolutely weird.Like I said I saw nothing that wrong. If you are much stronger that can happen (not breathe hard). He won by 10 seconds from Vauquelin and Pidcock. Interesting they can tune motors so you don't win by too much? Pog was obviously at his limits else why was he constantly looking over his shoulder?
Were bikes not inspected after FW? IF anything is going on all roads lead back to the UCI. Then we are back to the conspiracy theories being posted here a while ago.
I am not ruling out motors but applying Occam’s razor I very much doubt that. The more likely explanation is is he just way stronger.
