That when a rider is a little stronger than the rest in this type of race. This is just how it looks. Vollering did a very similar thing to Pogacar one hour later. I'm trying to coutner the narrative that every time someone wins a race in impressive fashion, it must be doping related.
It might be useful to look at patterns and the overall picture instead of feigning that this single race exists in some sort of vacuum. Today's excursion might not have been his wildest or most impressive ride, but the issue arises when one rider is likely to win all five monuments, the Tour de France, and the World Championship in
one and the same season. And then we haven't even considered the fashion with which he wins these.
Maybe he
"only" won by 34 seconds today, but what we witnessed today was a Tour de France-winning climber basically taking 80 percent of all the turns in the last 55 kilometers with arguably the strongest cobble-specialist of this generation glued to his back wheel, only to then drop him like a sack of potatoes once he saw fit.
You're absolutely correct that it doesn't
have to be doping-related
every time a rider wins a race in this fashion, but sometimes it would genuinely be moronic to dispel the notion. Again, it's not about this
one win. It's about the bigger picture and the patterns.
Just to be absolutely crystal clear about the bigger picture and the patterns: This is a rider from a nation that very recently had a notorious and rather large doping scandal, who is riding for two of arguably the worst doping sinners in modern history, representing a nation state that has zero qualms with modern-day slavery, doing things that would have been considered so laughably suspicious if they had been done by Chris Froome or Lance Armstrong, all while basically breathing through his nose.
This particular bird looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, so what exactly do you think we're looking at?