-
Willing to volunteer time as a moderator? We'd love to hear from you!
- Nov 6, 2020
- 955
- 1,230
- 7,180
3 of these won't do a grand tour this year.
That seems crazy. No wonder Dennis is off.
Which 3 from the Giro/Tour teams are definitely doing the Vuelta to keep them out?
- Apr 13, 2021
- 6,174
- 16,219
- 17,180
I guess Amador is happy getting paid a lot to be home with his family. Which is understandable.
Dennis must've pissed somebody off.
Dennis must've pissed somebody off.
- Sep 29, 2013
- 1,865
- 1,342
- 13,680
Wouldn't Dennis be out to prepare for the Olympics? Ineos might have promised him full support for the games when he signed with them. Covid just messed things up last year.
Ineos usually manages to win, even when things don't seem to go their way, I expect them to win with someone.
Ineos usually manages to win, even when things don't seem to go their way, I expect them to win with someone.
- Nov 6, 2020
- 955
- 1,230
- 7,180
Of course.
Seems wild that after dominating the Tour de Suisse, 4 of their 7 from that race may not make a GT roster in 2021.
- Mar 12, 2010
- 747
- 349
- 10,680
- Nov 6, 2020
- 955
- 1,230
- 7,180
I think that team is a little too climby, I think they have given up on Sosa so they will probably get a bigger guy in. Not sure what they will do with Rodriguez.
- Nov 12, 2010
- 4,253
- 1,314
- 18,680
- Sep 11, 2016
- 2,559
- 2,629
- 17,180
According the Gazzetta, just before the Giro, rumours of Sosa leaving Ineos,
View: https://twitter.com/cirogazzetta/status/1390599213499756546?s=20
- Apr 16, 2009
- 17,354
- 6,419
- 28,180
He was long listed. Only short listed in this forum TBF. Few days ago I saw that they had added Castroviejo. That was strange. I feel like they want to win the Tour in the mountains and not in the cross winds. Strange.
Last edited:
- Apr 16, 2009
- 17,354
- 6,419
- 28,180
- Apr 16, 2009
- 17,354
- 6,419
- 28,180
That's how he won the Tour. However Roglic does exactly the same. Counting on Thomas beating Roglic at the game would be completely nonsense!
- Apr 16, 2009
- 17,354
- 6,419
- 28,180
There is no way, if I am Ineos, that I would not take Rohan to the Tour for that reason. No way. You are a professional and you get paid for that reason. If that is the true reason then it is stupid decision IMHO.
As for my opinion of the team I say the team looks great as long as Castro is fully recovered.
I doubt Carapaz will be there (regardless of the Tour). Sosa is leaving, so no. I think Pidcock won't be, I may be wrong. But he's had a long year. I'd expect Swift or Doull, maybe Hayter
So, I have been thinking about the Ineos strategy/tactics for taking on Pogacar and Roglic in the Tour. Given the strength they have combined with the possibility that they will need to send one of their GC contenders on early or relatively early attacks during stages, I was trying to game that out in the framework of an individual stage.
Assuming that is what they do, and I freely acknowledge that is an assumption - they could end up trying a different approach to winning the Tour - they would be hoping for Pogacar and/or Roglic to either be unable or unwilling to chase down the attack, or to have one of their other GC contenders come over the top of the Slovenians when the original attack is brought back. Which makes sense, as far as it goes.
But two thoughts occur: first, with two riders/teams chasing one rider/team, if the Slovenians are willing to work together to counter such an attack, it will blunt the effectiveness of the tactic.
Second, this does not even consider what the other teams in the race may want to do in such a scenario. While I think it overwhelmingly likely that the winner of the Tour will come from the Ineos team or Pogacar and Roglic, I don’t think all of the contenders are conceding the Tour. They may well have roles to play in chasing attacks down, if not in a realistic hope of winning the Tour, then of placing a rider on the podium, or even in the top 5 or 10. Their teams may not be much help, though I think Movistar at least may be able to do something if they function as a team, but the individual contenders themselves can assist to some degree.
These considerations do not necessarily make the early attack a hopeless cause, but it is not a tactic that I think it makes sense to base the team’s entire approach to the Tour around. I think that Ineos are going to have to have multiple approaches they are willing to utilize, and will have to probably make snap decisions about when to switch tactics. More than any other GT, I think this is where we find out if Ineos have more to work with than the generally more than sufficient strength of their team and riders.
Assuming that is what they do, and I freely acknowledge that is an assumption - they could end up trying a different approach to winning the Tour - they would be hoping for Pogacar and/or Roglic to either be unable or unwilling to chase down the attack, or to have one of their other GC contenders come over the top of the Slovenians when the original attack is brought back. Which makes sense, as far as it goes.
But two thoughts occur: first, with two riders/teams chasing one rider/team, if the Slovenians are willing to work together to counter such an attack, it will blunt the effectiveness of the tactic.
Second, this does not even consider what the other teams in the race may want to do in such a scenario. While I think it overwhelmingly likely that the winner of the Tour will come from the Ineos team or Pogacar and Roglic, I don’t think all of the contenders are conceding the Tour. They may well have roles to play in chasing attacks down, if not in a realistic hope of winning the Tour, then of placing a rider on the podium, or even in the top 5 or 10. Their teams may not be much help, though I think Movistar at least may be able to do something if they function as a team, but the individual contenders themselves can assist to some degree.
These considerations do not necessarily make the early attack a hopeless cause, but it is not a tactic that I think it makes sense to base the team’s entire approach to the Tour around. I think that Ineos are going to have to have multiple approaches they are willing to utilize, and will have to probably make snap decisions about when to switch tactics. More than any other GT, I think this is where we find out if Ineos have more to work with than the generally more than sufficient strength of their team and riders.
- Aug 6, 2010
- 6,782
- 5,969
- 23,180
I see Ineos racing fairly normally, despite not having the strongest gc rider on paper. They will look for an opportunity that arises in crosswinds, and if Porte is dropped, but so is Pogacar or Roglic, then that's a win for Ineos, and they will try to drive home that advantage. Ineos' best chance is that entering the Pyrenees, one of the Slovenians is out of contention, and Ineos still have 2 cards to play at that point, so they can double team that favourite. I doubt that Ineos would attack before the final climb though. "Long range" would be Carapaz attacking at the bottom of the final climb on stage 17 or 18 when a minute down on gc; that sort of scenario.
Anybody_but..
BANNED
- Sep 27, 2020
- 410
- 171
- 980
They will not create crosswinds themselves but either will try to eliminate 0,5-1 km mountain finishes by final 3-5 km repeated attacks or will lose the Tour.
9, 17 and 18 stages might be not sufficient but shouldn't wait till 3rd week and try attacks also at 8, 11 or 15.
9, 17 and 18 stages might be not sufficient but shouldn't wait till 3rd week and try attacks also at 8, 11 or 15.
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
Paris-Roubaix 2025, one day monument, April 13 (men)- Started by Krzysztof_O
- Replies: 2K
-
-
Amstel Gold Race 2025, one day classic, April 20 (men's)- Started by Lequack
- Replies: 821
-
Ronde van Vlaanderen 2025, one day monument, April 6 (men's)- Started by Lequack
- Replies: 2K
-
-
Itzulia Basque Country 2025, April 7th-12th- Started by Samu Cuenca
- Replies: 1K
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram