Re: Re:
Red Rick said:
Vasilis said:
yaco said:
Too much fuss is made of Sky - Yes they dominate the TDF, had some success in the Giro and the Vuelta and are hard to beat in hillier one week stage races - But they are middle of the road in the classics part of the calendar and have no sprinters of note - I'd argue that Quick Step are more dominant in classics/one day races than Sky are in GT's and one week stage races.
The fact Quickstep just beat their annual victory record can attest to that.
Quickstep and Sky aren't even remotely comparable in how bad they are for the entertainment value of the sport.
No they aren't. Most of Quick Step's wins are from sprints. Viviani, Gaviria, Jacobsen, Hodeg - even Alaphilippe's to an extent.
Sky on the other hand don't have sprinters, so they attack on climbs. Froome - Giro stage 19. A career defining performance. Thomas being the first to win on Alpe d'Huez in yellow. Bernal attacking throughout the year. Moscon in the late season.
Some of you need to get rid of this Sky stereotype you have wrapped yourself in and embrace reality. This includes the UCI President. To quote from a recent Velonews article
“Today everything is measured to a millimeter,” UCI president David Lappartient said. “How many people are really captivated? In [soccer], you have these extraordinary comebacks, but we do not have that much on the Tour de France.”
When was last time there was a genuine Tour de France comeback (excluding TTs)? 2006? Best ignore that one. Else we're going back to the 80s.
If he wanted a comeback he should have watched this year's Giro. Courtesy of Team Boring.