Gosh there are so many people on here who have so much insight info on SKY and seem to be the only people who know how SKY work or how teams are built
Not to metion lecturing the rest of us on what riders will be picked but then going on to say such and such will be picked if so and so is not ill

Well howdy doody ..what insights
Can I just say numbers do not equal selection ...and a team is not made up of many of the same otherwise its not really a team
Also number count for nothing ...some of the best numbers never translate into the best performance
The riders with the best numbers at Astana before the Giro in 2015 was Taarame
The rider with the best numbers (after Froome) at the 2015 Dauphine was Roche (who did not have a bad Tour last year ) and who was in great form at the Vuelta before crashing
I don;t care who goes to the Tour but I would not bring Kwait as not robust enough...As he is currently ill is a good indicator that putting him through 3 further weeks may not be a good idea
Kiryenkia on the other hand has just shown how strong he is in Suisse
its a no brainer...why this is up for debate is a wonder to me
Same with Heano versus Nieve. Of course I am one of those that doesn't know about inside SKY

but even I know that a one week race is very different to a 3 week Tour and how you go over 3 weeks is key
Again given his experience and form and 3 week form I'f go Nieve every day
But hey hoe not long to go now to find out