- Sep 2, 2011
- 17,632
- 13,957
- 28,180
He generally prefers to be on the receiving end of monetary transactions.Is it Froome?
He generally prefers to be on the receiving end of monetary transactions.Is it Froome?
He generally prefers to be on the receiving end of monetary transactions.
Of the 20 million, 35% will go into advertising, 25% into admin fees. 20% into staffing costs and 15% lost to fraud, leaving just enough to sign clement champoussin on a 2 year deal.So does NetCompany when it comes to making deals with the public sector in Denmark, to be fair.
Of the 20 million, 35% will go into advertising, 25% into admin fees. 20% into staffing costs and 15% lost to fraud, leaving just enough to sign clement champoussin on a 2 year deal.
I've heard you have to sign their younger brother to attract the rider you really want, so I'm thinking they should go all in on Bryan Alaphilippe.
Yet despite the pressure of the moment, the team’s preparation proved decisive. “A team time trial is really different from an individual one,” he said. “It’s something the team has focused on a lot this year. It’s an important factor in a lot of the big races this season, so we’ve put a big emphasis on it.”
Behind the scenes, that focus has extended well beyond the riders themselves. “There’s a lot going on behind the scenes that people don’t see. So it’s really nice to be able to finish it off for them as well.”
They had a chance of beating Vingegaard?What a mess today in Paris-Nice. They’ve blown probably their only real chance of winning a major stage race this season.
I think Vauqelin would have finished within 10-20 seconds of Vingegaard if in the same group at the bottom of the climb. With this weather, who knows the natural difference in level (Vingegaard always the better rider) would have been neutralised / reversed...They had a chance of beating Vingegaard?
And even had they pivoted to Vauquelin earlier, they were never bringing his group back.
Once again, how do you suggest Vauquelin was meant to start the final climb with Vingegaard once he’d missed out in the echelons? Teleportation?I think Vauqelin would have finished within 10-20 seconds of Vingegaard if in the same group at the bottom of the climb. With this weather, who knows the natural difference in level (Vingegaard always the better rider) would have been neutralised / reversed...
If they pivoted to Vauquelin earlier, they'd at least still have a chance for the win, either through a coup (unlikely), Vauquelin dropping Vingegaard (unlikely) or Vingegaard dropping out due to a crash / illness (not wishing for that, not very likely but has happened before).
The most important issue now for Ineos / Vauquelin is that Paris-Nice was probably the best race to support Vauqelin as it's a French guy in a French race, but they let him down.
Well, they could have dropped Tarling back early, but the risk of isolating Onley and having more issues kept them from doing that. I‘d only change the tactic once Onley started dying at the foot of the penultimate climb, but Vauquelin would only maybe finish 20 seconds closer with that help.Once again, how do you suggest Vauquelin was meant to start the final climb with Vingegaard once he’d missed out in the echelons? Teleportation?
As good as Tarling is, he was not turning a gap that had ballooned to 1.5 minutes by the first climb into a catch all by himself.Well, they could have dropped Tarling back early, but the risk of isolating Onley and having more issues kept them from doing that. I‘d only change the tactic once Onley started dying at the foot of the penultimate climb, but Vauquelin would only maybe finish 20 seconds closer with that help.
