coinneach said:It strikes me as this forum preaches to the converted and the volume of innuendo confirms suspicions BUT that doesn't make it right.
There are so many falsehoods in the 128 pages that it would take hours and hours to correct them all.
I would just say, someone has to win the tour, and by this stage, the winner often comes from the team that is strongest.
Sky do ride like US Postal, but that's because US Postal were the strongest team (for whatever reasons) AND because it's the best way to win the tour if your leader is the best Time Trialist.
There is nothing in their style or development that proves doping or even suggests it (apart from the rapid improvement of Froome, which is explained by his recovery from a parasitic illness). Cavendish has not improved coming over to them.
I know we have all been fooled before but what is the point of following a sport if all you are going to do is shout "booo"? I hate the company SKY, and how money can be used to buy success but Wiggins and the cycling team has given me a real thrill this year. I am sorry for those fans "addicted to doping" so much they can't enjoy it.
Froome's climbing provides me with plenty of enjoyment, that does not preclude me from believing he's a doper.