So the fake imaginary disease delayed the unleash of the miraculous wonder drug result Froome ?Cyivel said:I know this may raise a few laughs but it was the bilharzia.
Follow all the latest news and results from the Tour de Romandie 2022!
Giro d'Italia is fast approaching - Check out the Cycling News Giro d’Italia 2022 preview!
So the fake imaginary disease delayed the unleash of the miraculous wonder drug result Froome ?Cyivel said:I know this may raise a few laughs but it was the bilharzia.
Nope no doubts at all, I think he dopes. What makes you think he/Sky is clean?Ventoux Boar said:A bigger one is why you don't have the courage of your convictions. He didn't ride the tour because he was a donkey until 6 weeks before the Vuelta. You said so above.
Unless you're having some doubts now you've had a chance to think about it?
Bingo - I couldn't have put it better myself.martinvickers said:That's not the choice they faced. Complete hindsight red herring.
By your lights what they must have had, prior to Vuelta was
1 grupetto rider approaching end of contract.
1 jar of super special sauce to get from 0 to GC in 6 weeks.
The choice you are implying they actually had, at that time was
a) drop and sign someone useful - cost, re Froome - nil
b) signed, then 'super' juiced - cost, re froome - well, new GT GC candidate for grupetto peanuts
b) 'super' juiced, then signed - cost, re Froome - paying a small fortune for former grupetto, p*ssing off your existing numero uno, and spreading 'the secret sauce' to s/o who might just walk off to another contract elsewhere with his new found superpowers.
And you're telling us the new leaders in strategic doping chose c).
Oooookey-dokey. Continue.
They're British and aside from David Millar and a few others(including track athletes) they've never ever ever doped.SundayRider said:Nope no doubts at all, I think he dopes. What makes you think he/Sky is clean?
Then what was your confusion about the Tour? Donkey pre-Vuelta then boom. Right?SundayRider said:Nope no doubts at all, I think he dopes. What makes you think he/Sky is clean?
I think its fair to say it delayed his consistency as it would for anyone else who had contracted it - without it he may have come to the fore a lot quicker.EnacheV said:So the fake imaginary disease delayed the unleash of the miraculous wonder drug result Froome ?
Funny post, I'm British, love the stereotypes, unfortunately it is not true.BYOP88 said:They're British and aside from David Millar and a few others(including track athletes) they've never ever ever doped.
When you fly into London when you're waiting to get through passport control they have signs saying 'Welcome to Britain the land where no one dopes'.
The only thing confusing is Sky's management.Ventoux Boar said:Then what was your confusion about the Tour? Donkey pre-Vuelta then boom. Right?
I have no evidence that he is clean. So I don't pretend to know.
Statistically there have been less British cyclists that have doped. Now that may be because there haven't been that many top flight British cyclists.BYOP88 said:They're British and aside from David Millar and a few others(including track athletes) they've never ever ever doped.
When you fly into London when you're waiting to get through passport control they have signs saying 'Welcome to Britain the land where no one dopes'.
You mean caught doping. It's pretty common in the uk. Probably more so these days than it was in the 80s & 90s. Uk sport anti doping don't seem that bothered based on the lack of action despite being given tipoffs.Justinr said:Statistically there have been less British cyclists that have doped. Now that may be because there haven't been that many top flight British cyclists.
Statistics are a great thing if you want to manipulate them. Statistically 8/11 US TDF winners (in terms of victories) were doped - that's 73%. Or you could say 2/3 of US TDF winners (in terms of people) were doped - that's 67%.
A slight aside but proves how you can make data support (or not) what you want.
He still had that at the Vuelta though.Cyivel said:I know this may raise a few laughs but it was the bilharzia.
Who said it was fake or imaginary?EnacheV said:So the fake imaginary disease delayed the unleash of the miraculous wonder drug result Froome ?
In the UK - rugby, both union and league doping is rife. Even amateur/semi pro cycling and triathlon is not immune.bobbins said:You mean caught doping. It's pretty common in the uk. Probably more so these days than it was in the 80s & 90s. Uk sport anti doping don't seem that bothered based on the lack of action despite being given tipoffs.
Woah, horsey!BYOP88 said:My take is this, I could be 100% right, 100% wrong or somewhere in-between;
They were going to let him become a free agent at the end of 2011, if they were planning to keep him beyond 2011 they would've already extended his contract. Then he does his Vuelta ride and they have to sign him at a higher price than they would've got him at pre-Vuelta. For a team that pays attention to detail, that has to be a touch embarrassing.
I think there are 1000's posts about the Schistosomiasis cover up story.The Hitch said:Who said it was fake or imaginary?
Schistosomiasis is a very real disease.
Maybe different people argue different things instead of being some sort of hive mind.EnacheV said:I think there are 1000's posts about the Schistosomiasis cover up story.
Or maybe it is real and a endurance sportsman infested with that **** can't perform well ?
You clinic guys must make up your mind. This is like "he has it" "no he hasnt" depending on how it helps to demonstrate your local statements.
Well yes, doping/caught doping - you know what I mean.bobbins said:You mean caught doping. It's pretty common in the uk. Probably more so these days than it was in the 80s & 90s. Uk sport anti doping don't seem that bothered based on the lack of action despite being given tipoffs.
Well yeah he didn't rid himself of it completely until late last year but the reason he didn't ride at the Tour in 2011 was due to him having to take a course of medication after Suisse.The Hitch said:He still had that at the Vuelta though.
Do you have a link? 'Cos I'm loathe to say it, bu that sounds to these ears suspiciously like are suggesting actual information, rather than conjecture, and there ain't no place for that new-fangled baloney round these parts, Mister.Cyivel said:Well yeah he didn't rid himself of it completely until late last year but the reason he didn't ride at the Tour in 2011 was due to him having to take a course of medication after Suisse.
Hang on. Sunday says he was a donkey and couldn't compete in a GT until the miracles started 6 weeks pre-Vuelta.Cyivel said:Well yeah he didn't rid himself of it completely until late last year but the reason he didn't ride at the Tour in 2011 was due to him having to take a course of medication after Suisse.
If you want to talk common sense, common sense dictates a guy doesn't go from never being inside the world top 275 before September 2011, to being in the top 5 just 10 months later and the number 1 18 months later.martinvickers said:Woah, horsey!
So they've taken this grupetto-fodder, not good enough even to 'dom' at the '11 Tour - pack him full of 'super sauce' the likes of which the world ain't ever seen (why no-one more 'believable' - they've several british riders, anyway, different argument, moving on...) - and send him off to change the world at the Vuelta - but don't bother extending his contract first so we don't end up paying him a fortune, or losing him AND the sauce before you've got any benefit from it?
You have deliberately engineered a way to spend millions of pounds for no good reason whatsoever. And this is presented as the 'real' story on ground of plausibility!
Basic common sense dictates: Give him another peanuts contract prior to Vuelta, he's only grupetto, and THEN sauce him up and watch the investment grow, or at best lose little money on a non-responder ... OR...if he starts looking more money, or sniffing around other teams - GIVE THE BL00DY SAUCE TO SOMEBODY ELSE who you already have bound in!!
That looks remarkably like evasion, Hitch. Why don't you address my point?The Hitch said:If you want to talk common sense, common sense dictates a guy doesn't go from never being inside the world top 275 before September 2011, to being in the top 5 just 10 months later and the number 1 18 months later.
Common sense isn't always right.The Hitch said:If you want to talk common sense, common sense dictates a guy doesn't go from never being inside the world top 275 before September 2011, to being in the top 5 just 10 months later and the number 1 18 months later.
All I've seen is that he was diagnosed at the end of 2010. I would have thought he would have been treated quite soon after that and quite quickly - the treatment is quite short isn't it?martinvickers said:Do you have a link? 'Cos I'm loathe to say it, bu that sounds to these ears suspiciously like are suggesting actual information, rather than conjecture, and there ain't no place for that new-fangled baloney round these parts, Mister.
Well indeed, but that doesn't stop us all from giving opinions - one way or the other. Life would be quite boring otherwise...Pentacycle said:Common sense isn't always right.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
N | Lance Armstrong Appreciation Thread: Part Deux | The Clinic | 10 |
Similar threads |
---|
Lance Armstrong Appreciation Thread: Part Deux |