- Jul 10, 2010
- 2,906
- 1
- 0
red_flanders said:I thought the topic was "Sky", and the discussion is in the clinic because that's where the discussion needed to have room to go. The topic is not necessarily "Sky Doping".
bobbins said:The magical gains spoken about with regards to the bike will be used to explain why a d-grade pro can out climb the pro peloton. The gullible British public fall for super Daves bs once more.
Froomey can't be a cheat - it's his new bike designed by a car company that made him win. Go Dave, you're the greatest sporting manager the world has ever seen, how you can motivate and manage people to perform far above their normal performance is astounding.
. . .
I concur that discussion of marginal gains is on-topic, not off. Especially as it fits the behavior pattern that some have discerned as hmmmm - misleading? misdirecting? lieing?
Don't take me as agreeing with the belief that Sky is lieing. I don't agree. But I do agree it could be seen that way, and thus discussion of any aspects of same is part of the discussion, as it is part of the behavior pattern.
bobbins said:. . .
I bet super Dave also promises both Froome and Brad the leadership for the Tour and leaves it to his staff to sort out again.
Nathan12 said:Two Sky riders in 2012 Tour winner Bradley Wiggins and runner-up Chris Froome have previously stood on the final podium in Paris and, you never know, the disappointment of missing a shot at the Giro just may serve as added motivation for Porte, who is considered much more than a super domestique.
“That would be a dream but I know we’re going there for Chris and that makes sense,” he said. “I’m looking forward to the Tour. We’ve got a good team so hopefully I won’t have to sacrifice until a little bit later this year.”
I want a Sky 1-2-3 in Paris. The Internet will burn.
Oh, yes. It would, it would indeed.
You know, given the news coverage and interviews w/ Froome and Wiggins this year, a manipulative style of understatement appears to be par for the course for Brailsford management. Don't overestimate the significance of the word manipulative - all management is manipulative. Has to be. But, one method is to knowingly let, or even encourage, people to believe something to be true that in essence is not. I think we have a former Brit rider who posts here who could speak to this - and I think they would agree. It seems like Sky is pretty good at this sort of management style. Personally, I put this style in my "dirty tricks" column.
I also still think Sky is relatively clean, and has been. One of the problems cycling and anti-doping efforts face is that the products are not necessarily black and white, either in detection or in use. But I've said that before, in other words. So you guys probably already know I think that way. I also think Sky, like others, have been or are willing to indulge in grey-area products. Perhaps even stuff that "isn't illegal" - yet. This latest painkiller product is a perfect example. You notice this "style" also fits with the management behavior of not being absolutely transparent.
It is even possible, and possibly even likely, that the Sky management crew do not realize they mislead people through misdirection. It is certainly in the realm of typical human behavior to not be all that aware of what another person is thinking. Or to sufficiently care. I don't know any of the players. Like you, I just know what I read in the news. So, who knows - but I do think there is a consistency in the pattern that emerges.