Team Ineos (Formerly the Sky thread)

Page 13 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Caruut said:
Now Richie Porte is dropping Scarponi and Sanchez. At least try and conceal it lads.

Its not that they are doing it. Its that they are doing it in the name of clean cycling that hurts me most.
 
Jan 27, 2011
3,399
0
0
Shiii when people like Froome start dropping Ferrari-clients like Menchov and Nibali, Geert Leinders mustve had some "Marginal Gains" in his doping knowledge. Holy **** :D
 
Jul 3, 2009
18,948
5
22,485
Havetts said:
Shiii when people like Froome start dropping Ferrari-clients like Menchov and Nibali, Geert Leinders mustve had some "Marginal Gains" in his doping knowledge. Holy **** :D

Umm, do they have a swimming coach?
 
Oct 30, 2011
2,639
0
0
SaxonUK said:
No, no, it really is, without positive drug tests or another form of solid evidence, journalists will not go on witch hunts about riders who people suspect of doping.

Paul Kimmage ring a bell?
L'Equipe have stuck their necks out a bit, too.
 
Mar 18, 2009
4,186
0
0
Gloin22 said:
Do you have any evidence ? Any real evidence except your view ? :rolleyes: * laughs a bit*

None.

I mean, the fact that of the 10 riders marked "very suspicious" on the UCI's list of blood passport riders, 6 were Sky riders is clearly just a coincidence.

And the doctor at the head of the Rabobank organized doping scheme a few years back being a doctor for team Sky now? Complete coincidence as well.

LONG LIVE SKY
 
Feb 10, 2010
10,645
20
22,510
Gloin22 said:
Do you have any evidence ? Any real evidence except your view ? :rolleyes: * laughs a bit*

Are you serious? Does a Sky train bllllllloooooowwwwwiiiinngggg the field apart look familiar? Is it different this time somehow?
 
Nov 17, 2009
221
0
0
DV359568.jpg
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
DirtyWorks said:
Are you serious? Does a Sky train bllllllloooooowwwwwiiiinngggg the field apart look familiar? Is it different this time somehow?

The funniest part was that Rogers and Porte even after sitting on the front and pushing massive turns beat home riders who were sitting in from the wind!
 
Oct 16, 2009
3,864
0
0
**** Chris Froome, **** Bradley Wiggins, **** Dave Brailsford, **** Bobby Julich, **** Tim Kerrison and **** Team Sky for setting cycling back ten years. Hopefully these clowns are busted soon because if not I'm afraid this is the standard that all others teams will have to follow over the next few years.

Maybe I'm being a drama queen now, but it's one thing to dope your best rider, to dope an entire team is sickening. And to be so goddamn obvious about it... it's arrogant and an insult the fans.
 
Feb 16, 2011
1,456
5
0
issoisso said:
None.

I mean, the fact that of the 10 riders marked "very suspicious" on the UCI's list of blood passport riders, 6 were Sky riders is clearly just a coincidence.

And the doctor at the head of the Rabobank organized doping scheme a few years back being a doctor for team Sky now? Complete coincidence as well.

LONG LIVE SKY

I refuse to believe this guy would have anything to do with such vulgar antics
1322830857_1.jpg
 
Aug 19, 2011
960
182
10,180
I'll wait to see what the power data estimate chappies come up with on that rather than anything kneejerk. The climb never having been done before doesn't help with identifying just how "impressive" that was. Neither does the fact that so many much fancied climbers got outclassed by a number of more ordinary riders (and not just Sky ones).

Wiggins gaining a whopping 5 seconds on Nibali and 17 seconds on Taaramae isn't exactly eyebrow raising, with neither of those being considered top drawer climbers and neither being regular features in the Clinic. Nor was Wiggins getting unhitched by Evans but managing to just about crawl back to level pegging with him. That was Wiggins clearly on the limit.

As for Froome, he continues to test my credulity to breaking point and as in the Vuelta, he appeared to have plenty more left in the tank there but was constrained by team orders. Froome has now performed at his best in consecutive years when recovering from diseases. A pattern that was hard enough to make sense of the first time round. I'm clinging to him being born and raised at altitude, but surely he'd have made a quicker impression in the sport if that was a major factor? The reality now facing us is that if Froome doesn’t belong in this sub-forum, then he is the greatest cyclist on the planet and by some margin in terms of climbing ability, endurance and recovery.

Sky must be inwardly delighted he lost a minute or it'd be the Vuelta all over again. I know I am.
 
Jul 3, 2009
18,948
5
22,485
So what are Sky doing different in their preparation which makes them vastly superior to their rivals? It's a bit like OPQS in the classics.
 
Feb 16, 2011
1,456
5
0
thehog said:
The funniest part was that Rogers and Porte even after sitting on the front and pushing massive turns beat home riders who were sitting in from the wind!

Rogers and Porte have always done that, for instance, at the ToC..the Tour of Canberra