Ryo Hazuki said:
my god what an idiotic post. I'm sure everyone could tell him leinders was the devil incarnated. by 2009, nobody knew any of this yet, let alone someone outside of road cycling like brailsford. I'm sure it's a mistake he regrets for a long time.
1. If the 'leak' about Leinders from Leipheimer turns out to be true, and I suspect it will, then it does
look very very difficult for Brailsford. At the very least, he has let a viper in the nest. If the leak is true, there is no better conclusion, and several worse ones. clinicians will of course choose the conclusion they find most personally attractive.
2. On the other hand (and 'les patrons' of the clinic will turn on me for this

), I think it is at least worth noting the number of riders who have immediately come out in support from Leinders, saying 'nothing' to see here. not because it's true, (I don't personally believe that for a second) but one wonders if, for what ever reason, there were a lot of people ready to 'vouch' for Leinders, and were any of them in the ear of Brailsford saying, oh he's great, he's legit.
3. come what may - and again, Sky did dump him, and that was before USADA - come what may, using Peters during interviews has some sort of human lie detector has got to stop - it's plainly failed, even if we only look at Yates, De jong, etc.
4. Finally, sky are going to have to get used to monday morning quarterbacks. If this leinders thing proves anything, it's that 'the benefit of the doubt' has no place in cycling any more. Probably rightly. People are going to be expected to dig, and dig deep, before hiring - and for a team like Sky, well resourced and publically committed to racing clean, taking people's word is no longer going to wash, if it ever did.
We must await further events now, i suppose...