It's based on raw W/kg data, apparently, not on previous climbing prowess or expected outputs for a given rider.happychappy said:Voeckler yellow? Ha ha ha ha.
JimmyFingers said:Doesn't exactly say much we don't already know
It says the Sky duo is more suspect than Moreau and Virenque.JimmyFingers said:Doesn't exactly say much we don't already know
thehog said:You read the article in French?
You do impress Jimmy![]()
Netserk said:It says the Sky duo is more suspect than Moreau and Virenque.
Netserk said:It says the Sky duo is more suspect than Moreau and Virenque.
Zam_Olyas said:Speaking of Moreau.Not long ago, folks were saying how Wiggins is just a sh!t british version of Moreau. How things have changed![]()
Well, yes, but the thing is I don't think they used 6.0 W/kg as the magical threshold for clean cycling, so they're calling out some performances that the PR machine says are kosher. That's my impression without having actually read the article.JimmyFingers said:If its on pure wattage power-meters make it a little redundant applied to today's performances. I thought the focus swaps from turbo charging to recovery and consistency, and staying below suspicious thresholds?
whittashau said:Shouldn't that chart being in it's own thread? Since I'm sure most people have gotten sick of reading this thread and probably wont see it.
hrotha said:Well, yes, but the thing is I don't think they used 6.0 W/kg as the magical threshold for clean cycling, so they're calling out some performances that the PR machine says are kosher. That's my impression without having actually read the article.
Von Mises said:Well, they are actually saying that there is magical threshold and it is obviously one of the weaknesses of this analysis.
But their magical threshold is not 6.0 W/kg is what I was getting at.Von Mises said:Well, they are actually saying that there is magical threshold and it is obviously one of the weaknesses of this analysis.
Ferminal said:Well he was a better pursuiter, so it wouldn't be unsurprising.
