RichWalk said:the same 'suspicious performances' updated rhetoric (read BS) .
Froome's cumulative performances aren't suspicious?
Wiggo?
That's just the top podium guys.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
RichWalk said:the same 'suspicious performances' updated rhetoric (read BS) .
DirtyWorks said:Froome's cumulative performances aren't suspicious?
Wiggo?
That's just the top podium guys.
DirtyWorks said:hmm. Yes. You mean the federation that hides positives is going to suddenly stop hiding them? Or do you mean the national federation (USA Cycling, no wait BC) that will enforce anti-doping? Because the Pro team and the sports federation supposedly doing rules enforcement and creating grand tour champions are really one.
DirtyWorks said:After the statute of limitations of course! What good will it do then?
DirtyWorks said:All of which were present during Armstrong's fraud. All of them explained away by the most ridiculous reasons since Santa Claus.
DirtyWorks said:Similarly, all legitimate warnings are explained away in 2014.
Feels like 2005 all over again.
Benotti69 said:Red text used to correct, free of charge.
RownhamHill said:Oh, I see, we are talking about Armstrong now. I thought the truth was meant to have set you free?
DirtyWorks said:No. In 2014 we're seeing the same kind of flimsy stories attempting to explain extraordinary and not plausible performances. That's all really.
I would think by now more people would come to the conclusion that since the UCI and a national federation helped create an international sports fraud once that more people could look at Sky and see the same thing, only more sophisticated this time. But, I guess not.
Catwhoorg said:Not that it matters one jot to your argument, but minor point FYI.
There is a 10K open water swim at the olympics, takes about 2 hours for women, about 10 mins faster for men.
(Was a targeted event in 2012 for a UK medal, but Keri-Anne Paine came 4th).
Benotti69 said:I agree, UCI, ASO and nominated one pro team to decide the TdF to maximise coverage and profits. The only thing that went wrong last time was the rider was a sociopath so this time different riders for different years........
ebandit said:I don't get it a single team dominating an event can't be good for interest
ebandit said:I don't get it a single team dominating an event can't be good for interest
for max coverage I would look to a ding-d0ng rivalry between several leaders
from differing teams
and anyway................sky / froomey are dull
Mark L
Dear Wiggo said:Chef doing chefy stuff == marginal gain:
Except...
TheGame said:The CSC chef was hired as he was known by Scott Sunderland. The first three months of the season Sky were using a BC chef and trying to put all the riders on BC meals. The result, **** loads of the riders got ill over the first 2 months of the year and had to drop out of races because the "diet" didn't work. He was brought in by SS after the team realised that a specialist Track diet cooked by some prat from British Cycling wasn't cutting it.
Exactly the same reason Leinders was brought in. The doctors Sky hired at the start had no experience of cycling, and the riders kicked off and protested and said they wanted proper doctors with experience of the sport.
RownhamHill said:Yep. And that's why I absolutely believed Armstrong was doping way back when - to the degree that I didn't follow cycling for ten years - you just had to see the way he treated Bassons to take the hint. But I didn't think we were talking about convicted drugs cheat Lance Armstrong at the moment?
Yet Wiggins treatment of literally everybody that might doubt him does not proved a hint to doping in your mind. After all, it does sound like you are using Lance's treatment of Basson for forming your belief.
That's kinda weird.
We're all lazy *** ****s and ****ers. Shocking
Thats not entirely true issit? Here we have Roger Palfreeman, now at BMC, formerly at Linda Mac, with a young Twiggo:TheGame said:Exactly the same reason Leinders was brought in. The doctors Sky hired at the start had no experience of cycling, and the riders kicked off and protested and said they wanted proper doctors with experience of the sport.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:Thats not entirely true issit? Here we have Roger Palfreeman, now at BMC, formerly at Linda Mac, with a young Twiggo:
http://www.pelotonwebdesigns.com/lindamccartney/2000/racing/giro/giro1.htm
How long was he again at Sky?
The Hitch said:Very interesting.
Why are your riders so much better than everyone else who ever rode a bicycle?
ebandit said:really?............of course hitch sky riders ............the best Ever
next you will be telling us team sky don't have any fans other than in
britain.............none at All
interesting others take on ASO wanting a british winner I would have thought
a french winner would be more greatly desired
Mark L
Fearless Greg Lemond said:Thats not entirely true issit? Here we have Roger Palfreeman, now at BMC, formerly at Linda Mac, with a young Twiggo:
http://www.pelotonwebdesigns.com/lindamccartney/2000/racing/giro/giro1.htm
How long was he again at Sky?
Freddythefrog said:Is that the same Johd Deering who co wrote "It's all about the bike - by hear/see/do no evil Yates ? What was his explanation ? Did it reveal anything ?
roundabout said:He did survive the purge.
Is it because the Italian arm of Sky likes him that much?
Are you really telling me that Kurt Asle Arvesen and Servais Knaven haven't been clean for their entire career!?!bobbins said:I don't think the purge really worked did it!