- Sep 3, 2012
 
- 638
 
- 0
 
- 0
 
wansteadimp said:Surely it depends on Rogers? With all the sports scientists in place presumably they are analyzing performance and tailoring training based on those numbers.
Rogers could be an incredible numbers geek who is totally into it and understands the analysis and could predict where the Sky team were likely to take his training, or
He could be hopeless with numbers and scientific data and just trains to what Sky told him to do.
If he is in the former camp then he could be incredibly useful to Saxo, if he is in the latter camp he would be next to useless.
Same goes for any interest he shows in what they may or may not shove in to his body. "Whats this? How does it work?" compared to "Just give me the good stuff and watch me go".
He'll be somewhere between the two extremes I've highlighted but he will tend to one end of the spectrum or the other.
But just training what Sky tell him to do would be not hard to remember though? Surely? Then the info would be used to help another team. I'm open minded to new training techniques but baffled as how a rider could forget! A goldfish yes... But a professional athlete who cuts his cloth at performing forgets or cant replicate a method or technique??
Edit: And then double that with another rider then treble etc. doesn't follow reason. If their knowledge retention is so poor I would off load them pronto. What do you mean you forgot what we showed you last week....
				
		
			