- Jul 24, 2009
- 2,579
- 58
- 11,580
Yup, even happened to Greg LeMond. Asthma apparently.Benotti69 said:Apparently lots of riders in the giro with chest infections and colds. Go figure.
Yup, even happened to Greg LeMond. Asthma apparently.Benotti69 said:Apparently lots of riders in the giro with chest infections and colds. Go figure.
DirtyWorks said:Define worst.
oldcrank said:Yup, even happened to Greg LeMond. Asthma apparently.
Wallace and Gromit said:Absolute most use of dope. Riis and all the other Sixty Percenters most likely were.
DirtyWorks said:At that time there was no threat of an EPO positive as there was no test. Riis's generation and probably a few years prior to that would be their own hall of fame no one from later years could touch.
Then the arbitrary hematocrit level was introduced. Add later tests for EPO and CERA and you've got a third kind of performance not like the other two. And I haven't even mentioned the UCI's habit of hiding positives.
This is the fundamental problem of focusing exclusively on the athletes doping. The UCI has not stopped encouraging doping. They've just changed the rules.
Benotti69 said:Apparently lots of riders in the giro with chest infections and colds. Go figure.
about 90% of Australian Institute of Sport have one of those TUE's for asthma and bronchiodilaters for the Olympics.King Of The Wolds said:Half my office, too.
Most of the kids down our local athletics track have an inhaler.
Whatever, they're dots worth adding.
King Of The Wolds said:Half my office, too.
Most of the kids down our local athletics track have an inhaler.
Whatever, they're dots worth adding.
"You don't have to wear a space suit and pointy helmet to ride a bike," said Chris DiStefano, spokesman for Rapha, whose chief marketing officer once handled the Lance Armstrong account at Nike.
ChewbaccaD said:All fair points, and I will freely admit that I don't think (even though the numbers do not necessarily help me) that Wiggins would have podiumed in any of Armstrong's Tours. I don't however find that to be conclusive proof he is clean as I think he would have been in the top 10. I want Wiggins to be clean, but I am very suspicious of cycling in general now, and his dominance last year did not make me want to jump on the "we finally have a clean Tour champion" bandwagon.
ChewbaccaD said:What is happening right now (the day after the rest day...) is ridiculous. All of a sudden, the entire Sky team are better climbers than the rest of the peloton. Nothing suspicious about that....
ianfra said:I don't think Wiggins was 'dominant' in the Tour. Froome? But happily, in my considered opinion, both clean riders. Not my favourite team, but happy to acknowledge that there are people in this world who are honest. Not everyone is a cheating scumbag.
Dear Wiggo said:2 weeks in the yellow jersey and then smashing all and sundry in the final TT looked pretty darn dominant to me.
ianfra said:I don't think Wiggins was 'dominant' in the Tour. Froome? But happily, in my considered opinion, both clean riders. Not my favourite team, but happy to acknowledge that there are people in this world who are honest. Not everyone is a cheating scumbag.
Kender said:was only in yellow the whole time casue the dawg was on a leash
Dear Wiggo said:Irrelevant. ianfra is saying Wiggins did not look dominant. Do you agree or not?
Kender said:well if you leash someone in order to win yourself that's hardly dominant.
Dear Wiggo said:In your opinion, who dominated whom in the final TT? Or was it even?
Is it your argument that ianfra does not believe Wiggins was dominant at the Tour because on 2 occasions Froome managed to ride away from Wiggins on a climb?
Was there anyone else in the race beyond these 2 riders? Did Wiggins dominate any of them?
rata de sentina said:
