- Jan 16, 2010
- 693
- 23
- 10,030
The Chicken said:Exactly.
It's Prudhomme who'll give the orders to Sky to make it look less ridiculous. We're gonna see some terrible acting from Dawg and the borgs.
This has actually happened/is happening.
The Chicken said:Exactly.
It's Prudhomme who'll give the orders to Sky to make it look less ridiculous. We're gonna see some terrible acting from Dawg and the borgs.
bolingbroke said:Sky is still the only team in the peleton who insist on anti doping contracts which require no past doping charges and clauses where they can charge riders for bringing the team/sponsors into disrepute if their are revelations in the future. On the face of it they are the cleanest team out there.
If all we are going to do is used compared results as evidence of doping then cycling is really never going to get free of the unclean image. Progress is still going to happen without doping.
********. Virtually all teams have clauses that render a contract null and void if a rider is suspended or "brings the team/sponsors into disrepute". Katusha (KATUSHA!) made everyone sign a document to this effect years ago and it caused quite the controversy at the time. Not signing people with past doping charges, but then bringing in the likes of Rogers, Julich and Leinders is just a joke. Blatant PR posturing.bolingbroke said:Sky is still the only team in the peleton who insist on anti doping contracts which require no past doping charges and clauses where they can charge riders for bringing the team/sponsors into disrepute if their are revelations in the future. On the face of it they are the cleanest team out there.
If all we are going to do is used compared results as evidence of doping then cycling is really never going to get free of the unclean image. Progress is still going to happen without doping.
ChewbaccaD said:Nothing that happens today will change the extraterrestrial ride by Porte and Froome that we saw yesterday.
The Hitch said:Whats the reason for Froome riding as fast as Armstrong if he isn't doping.
And how fast do you believe Froome could have ridden yesterday if he did get put on a doping programme?
The Chicken said:Exactly.
It's Prudhomme who'll give the orders to Sky to make it look less ridiculous. We're gonna see some terrible acting from Dawg and the borgs.
hrotha said:Jesus Christ David Walsh has become unbearable. So much BS.
darwin553 said:Does anyone know Froome's aerobic capacity?
If we look at Armstrong, we know it was historically low compared to other TDF winners which points to, naturally speaking, Armstrong not being a man for the mountains.
hrotha said:Jesus Christ David Walsh has become unbearable. So much BS.
UlleGigo said:Aerobic capacity the key indicator of a mountain climber is it?
darwin553 said:I thought it was - could be wrong though?
Remember based on the numbers Armstrong was never going to succeed at the TDF but obviously the taking of something changed all that unlike GL who is well known to have a high V02max.
Setarkos said:EPO and blood doping increase the VO2max - that's how that kind of doping works.
Oho now you're in trouble.Setarkos said:EPO and blood doping increase the VO2max - that's how that kind of doping works.
Feel free to start a Movistar thread. I doubt you'll get anything but "Yep", "Duh" and "Of course".bigcog said:Well Moviestar have 6-7 riders at the front. It goes without saying what they are up too with their previous.![]()
yep, duh, of course.hrotha said:Feel free to start a Movistar thread. I doubt you'll get anything but "Yep", "Duh" and "Of course".
Libertine Seguros said:We don't yet know if Porte is play-acting, regrouping, or if he really did go too far yesterday and has paid for his arrogance.
kingjr said:whut
....
