Team Ineos (Formerly the Sky thread)

[red_flanders]

didnt they also say something about Froome winning because it's a clean era and that he could never win if the sport was still dirty?

funny how their stories change. must be hard to keep up with all the lies.

This says it all, really.

 

[the sceptic]

Why, wasn't there a thread about Mark Cavendish's teeth? Certain posters claim impartiality, Hitch perhaps included, but in my opinion it's a sham. And if pointing at Stannard and Cavendish's 'light' treatment at the clinic is evidence that Brits get a fair hearing here, I'll say the reason is because posters reserve their most vehement accusations of doping for the riders they like the least.

And I love the irony of trolls calling other posters trolls simply because they have a different opinion to them

Don't you yourself spend 99% of your posts in british related threads? Seems like you shouldn't be preaching about impartiality or giving people a fair hearing.

 

[Benotti69]

https://vimeo.com/121225895

are they sky colours perchance...

 

[Avoriaz]

https://vimeo.com/121225895

are they sky colours perchance...

No. He's clearly riding a Bianchi

 

[Benotti69]

No. He's clearly riding a Bianchi

Bianchi bikes for 2016 and big bodies the new marginal gains

 

[LaFlorecita]

Why, wasn't there a thread about Mark Cavendish's teeth?

No that was "Contador's Head"

 

[The Hitch]

Why, wasn't there a thread about Mark Cavendish's teeth? Certain posters claim impartiality, Hitch perhaps included, but in my opinion it's a sham.

See, this is precisely why you lot get constantly accused of sockpuppetry and trolling.

I actually have a pretty consistent and easily observable record of dismissing posters who try to argue they can tell who is doping by looking at their appearance, including in posts below when they were directed against Sky, and Cav.

http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showpost.php?p=1258765&postcount=1724

No offence, but, the case against Porte and Froome works perfectly fine without psudo scientific observations based on tv screen images.

http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=20473&page=11

Wtf does any of that have to do with anything in this thread.

You probably knew this and were trying to troll me by lumping me in with an opinion you knew i am quite strongly against to try and **** me off (what seems to me to be the raisondetre for most of your posts). Or you didn't, in which case its just as bad since you were randomly trying to lump me in without a clue in the world as to whether its actually true. I'm guessing its the first option though because its not the first time youve tried to accuse me of holding a position i clearly don't.

Either way its a pathetic post, and, to get back to my first line, if any of the supposed sky defenders who cry so much about tolerance and how stupid the forum is etc was remotely honest they would chastize you for making that post.

The same way I and others actually attack people like hog or blackcat (above) when they make silly posts or unfair posts.

But no one of jimmy's tribe will caution jimmy for the false claim made above.

They never do.
Cheapshots are afterall perfectly fine if they are directed against sky doubters, who deserve it. Then they cry about sky doubters being intolerant. And are surprised when they get accused of trolling

 

[Ventoux Boar]

"The war on Christmas". Cry me a river.

This will kiss it better Hitch. Kool aid from start to finish. Utter tripe from Brailsford.

?Here we are,? he cries, flipping his phone to show a startling image of him playing darts with electrodes clamped around his skull.

 

[The Hitch]

Wait, what does that post have to do with me?

 

[Bernie's eyesore]

See, this is precisely why you lot get constantly accused of sockpuppetry and trolling.

I actually have a pretty consistent and easily observable record of dismissing posters who try to argue they can tell who is doping by looking at their appearance, including in posts below when they were directed against Sky, and Cav.

http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showpost.php?p=1258765&postcount=1724

http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=20473&page=11


You probably knew this and were trying to troll me by lumping me in with an opinion you knew i am quite strongly against to try and **** me off (what seems to me to be the raisondetre for most of your posts). Or you didn't, in which case its just as bad since you were randomly trying to lump me in without a clue in the world as to whether its actually true. I'm guessing its the first option though because its not the first time youve tried to accuse me of holding a position i clearly don't.

Either way its a pathetic post, and, to get back to my first line, if any of the supposed sky defenders who cry so much about tolerance and how stupid the forum is etc was remotely honest they would chastize you for making that post.

The same way I and others actually attack people like hog or blackcat (above) when they make silly posts or unfair posts.

But no one of jimmy's tribe will caution jimmy for the false claim made above.

They never do.
Cheapshots are afterall perfectly fine if they are directed against sky doubters, who deserve it. Then they cry about sky doubters being intolerant. And are surprised when they get accused of trolling

You had a good point until you invented 'Jimmy's tribe' and made yourself guilty of the very thing you were complaining about. Any chance you could list the members of thie tribe?

 

[ebandit]

lotto

See, this is precisely why you lot get constantly accused of sockpuppetry and trolling.

lost me earlier...............wonder if i'm lumped into...........'you lot'

the clinic..............................there is room for independent thought

............today i did notice team skys 'non show' at strade bianche

Mark L

 

[JimmyFingers]

You had a good point until you invented 'Jimmy's tribe' and made yourself guilty of the very thing you were complaining about. Any chance you could list the members of thie tribe?

Haha couldn't have said it better myself, a concise critique of the usual Hitch bombast

 

[Netserk]

You had a good point until you invented 'Jimmy's tribe' and made yourself guilty of the very thing you were complaining about. Any chance you could list the members of thie tribe?

A quick guess would be something like this, but I have probably missed a lot, and maybe some of them wouldn't be in that group according to Hitch.

JimmyFingers
martinvickers
Wallace and Gromit
Don't be late Pedro
del1962
mastersracer
Mellow Velo
RownhamHill
Justinr
Joachim
Parker
gooner
Bernie's eyesore
Froome19
MatParker117
TailWindHome
acoggan
Ventoux Boar
oldcrank
Taxus4a
EnacheV
willbick
leon7766
stutue
ebandit
wrinklyvet
darwin553
TheSpud

 

[ebandit]

winner

A quick guess would be something like this, but I have probably missed a lot, and maybe some of them wouldn't be in that group according to Hitch.

ebandit

do i win a team sky pinarello/team strip....................LOL

Mark L

 

[Ventoux Boar]

Je Suis Jimmy's Stiff Middle Finger.

X VB

 

[Franklin]

WTF is wrong with the people on this forum. Can we discuss doping again instead of this insanity?

Tribe this, clinic 12 that...

 

[The Hitch]

A quick guess would be something like this, but I have probably missed a lot, and maybe some of them wouldn't be in that group according to Hitch.

JimmyFingers
martinvickers
Wallace and Gromit
Don't be late Pedro
del1962
mastersracer
Mellow Velo
RownhamHill
Justinr
Joachim
Parker
gooner
Bernie's eyesore
Froome19
MatParker117
TailWindHome
acoggan
Ventoux Boar
oldcrank
Taxus4a
EnacheV
willbick
leon7766
stutue
ebandit
wrinklyvet
darwin553
TheSpud

I wouldn't have everyone in that list. I was talking more of the people only come here to troll, not all those who defend sky. At least not all of them are here purely to distrupt. Taking a quick look I don't recall MatParker117, Don't be late Pedro, Wallace and Gromit, Rowham hill being bad really, or at least they are somewhat honest and consistent, maybe MV too (the selfimposed exile MV, not the perma banned troll one). Some others aren't that bad either. Leon and oldcrank are joke accounts so if they are included so should Wonderlance.

 

[The Hitch]

Haha couldn't have said it better myself, a concise critique of the usual Hitch bombast

So you won't apologize for falsely claiming I was one of the people who accused Cav of doping based on his teeth when you knew that not to be true?

 

[The Hitch]

You had a good point until you invented 'Jimmy's tribe' and made yourself guilty of the very thing you were complaining about. Any chance you could list the members of thie tribe?

No, I was complaining about a) jimmy lying by claiming I said something I never did, and b) not one of the people who come here to defend Sky EVER chastizing other Sky defenders for trolling. Even when joachim was using the ebandit account as a platfor for a trolling free for all, not one Sky defender called him out, but some tried to play him as a victim and accuse others of trolling him.

at no point in my post do I do any of the above, and to jump on my use of the word "tribe" to try and discredit the whole point is pathetic

 

[JimmyFingers]

Why, wasn't there a thread about Mark Cavendish's teeth? Certain posters claim impartiality, Hitch perhaps included, but in my opinion it's a sham. And if pointing at Stannard and Cavendish's 'light' treatment at the clinic is evidence that Brits get a fair hearing here, I'll say the reason is because posters reserve their most vehement accusations of doping for the riders they like the least.

And I love the irony of trolls calling other posters trolls simply because they have a different opinion to them

So you won't apologize for falsely claiming I was one of the people who accused Cav of doping based on his teeth when you knew that not to be true?

Where exactly did I make that claim? Do you read what other people post, or merely read a snippet and decide what they are saying then lambast them for it. I didn't say you accused Cav, I said there was a thread about Cav's teeth, countering your claim that the clinic had never really gone for Cav.

And I'm sure the posters on the forum are relieved they have you to judge who is good or bad from that list. Hitch has spoken, hallelujah.

 

[skippythepinhead]

Looks like a bloodletting this week for Sky.

 

[Bernie's eyesore]

I wouldn't have everyone in that list. I was talking more of the people only come here to troll, not all those who defend sky. At least not all of them are here purely to distrupt. Taking a quick look I don't recall MatParker117, Don't be late Pedro, Wallace and Gromit, Rowham hill being bad really, or at least they are somewhat honest and consistent, maybe MV too (the selfimposed exile MV, not the perma banned troll one). Some others aren't that bad either. Leon and oldcrank are joke accounts so if they are included so should Wonderlance.

What a relief that I haven't been excluded. The thought that I might not have got up the nose of such a thoroughly repulsive individual as you has had me worried all evening.

 

[Bernie's eyesore]

Where exactly did I make that claim? Do you read what other people post, or merely read a snippet and decide what they are saying then lambast them for it. I didn't say you accused Cav, I said there was a thread about Cav's teeth, countering your claim that the clinic had never really gone for Cav.

And I'm sure the posters on the forum are relieved they have you to judge who is good or bad from that list. Hitch has spoken, hallelujah.

Well said Jimmy, you never said anything of the sort but I'm sure such a fact won't stop Hitch's rants. Now, about this tribe, is there a membership fee?

 

[luckyboy]

Daily Mail coming through with the fresh new revelations that Servais Knaven was doping at TVM

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/sport...ilsford-s-zero-tolerance-policy-pressure.html

 

[The Hitch]

Daily Mail coming through with the fresh new revelations that Servais Knaven was doping at TVM

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/sport...ilsford-s-zero-tolerance-policy-pressure.html

lol. world's biggest hypocrite dimspace jumping first onto a comment spot to complain that this has been reported before.

That didn't seem to stop dim from plagarizing a Dutch article on doping doctors by putting it through google translate and then pass it off as his own investigation.