ebandit said:honestly? if team sky say we're clean.........and detractors are unable to prove otherwise there must
be doubt
the pompous self righteous attitude of some is another factor which causes problems
Mark L
suffice it to recall Pat's 2012 slip of the tongue, not even half way through the TdF.Benotti69 said:You deny Sky lied?
Waiting for the UCI to find a positive of Sky was like waiting for Hein/Pat to find Armstrong positive.
Valverde is clean, but his dog was involved in questionable practicesMr.White said:armchairclimber said:Valverde has a pretty near perfect trajectory for a clean rider.![]()
Well.., it might sound silly, but he could be one of the cleaner guys out of that group![]()
ebandit said:cheap shot......................lobbing one over the bows of members here quoting cliched comparisons
to US postal fans rather than addressing issues with team sky
Mark L
Benotti69 said:How about Brian Cookson sending Oil Cookson to Colombia with Henao to 'monitor' altitude blood values?
Benotti69 said:How about Brian Cookson sending Oil Cookson to Colombia with Henao to 'monitor' altitude blood values?
djpbaltimore said:I don't know if it is fair to say that SKY are 'blatantly protected' from positives. That is one big difference between now and the USPS years. By LA's return in 2009, most of his GC contemporaries (whom he was beating by minutes) were serving bans of some kind. It doesn't look like the UCI is currently capable or motivated to ban any real GC riders of note. I can't speak for everybody, but most people could do the math on Lance by 2006. The people who were buying the 'fairy tales' were not people who understood the sport, but I think people tend to over-generalize the behavior of fans due to the actions of a vocal minority.
BYOP88 said:Benotti69 said:How about Brian Cookson sending Oil Cookson to Colombia with Henao to 'monitor' altitude blood values?
BTW did Sky ever publish that report?![]()
Catwhoorg said:BYOP88 said:Benotti69 said:How about Brian Cookson sending Oil Cookson to Colombia with Henao to 'monitor' altitude blood values?
BTW did Sky ever publish that report?![]()
The University said that it was imminent a couple of weeks ago. Basically held up in the scientific review.
Catwhoorg said:As a published scientist myself, I understand these things take time.
Its a good thing, as it means the reviewers actually read it and made some points that needed to be addressed.
Great post, well said.The_Cheech said:Being a Sky fan would be a heck of a lot more "palatable" did they not turn every one of their victories into some sort of indisputable proof of Brailsford intellectual and analytical superiority and a victory for technology as a whole. All of it expressed in a condescending tone that leaves many wishing any Sky test positive soon.
stokes asked them about it, but he got largely meaningless answers.Catwhoorg said:BYOP88 said:Benotti69 said:How about Brian Cookson sending Oil Cookson to Colombia with Henao to 'monitor' altitude blood values?
BTW did Sky ever publish that report?![]()
The University said that it was imminent a couple of weeks ago. Basically held up in the scientific review.
well *** me.Benotti69 said:
sniper said:well **** me.Benotti69 said: