Galic Ho said:
Bold. You need to listen properly then. That is possible clean. Anyone who thinks otherwise has their head screwed on incorrectly. Why does it work? A win one or two times a tour in a breakaway? Quite possible clean. Try backing up and going for GC after doing that. Everyone who has, history has shown, doped or was suspected of doping. Do you have any common sense today, or is this just a one off trip to loonieville?
This thread is based around Sky having a doping programme yet the team have not even started racing yet. I find this very unfair and cynical, yes Wiggins does raise a lot of suspicicon in me but to criticise a whole team before they even start is just wrong.
I was trying to make the point that if the Fench teams can win stages at the Tour and place riders in the Top 10, they do not go around shouting about all the anti-doping measures they do either. Why should Sky be any different.
Is it essential for Sky to have this big doping programme that some people keep insinuating they will have. They have good riders with mostly untarnished reputations who have achieved good results so why would they go down the doping path. I was trying to make the comparison with the French because I believe overall they are relatively clean also.
Then Blackcat made this point
the French dope. They just dont have big programs. And the ASO will not want another '98
I know what all the doping products are and how they are undetectable but if somebody says the above, I want them to explain what products are being used and how the French teams have never been linked with any episodes like Puerto, Feiburg clinic, Vienna clinic or had any riders caught for CERA or EPO. Considering the amount of teams/riders that have been linked with doping rings or busted in the last 10 years, it has to be something more than luck that the French have avoided trouble over the last decade. It now seems that quite a few people agree that the French are generally clean and its the exception like Blackcat who claim otherwise.
I know Sky have set the aim of winning the Tour within 5 years but I always felt that was just PR BS to interest the British media and general public that have seen Britains track success and follow the hype. If they honsestly want to do this, then maybe they will have to go down the doping route and Wiggins is the one person raising suspicion but there is no actual uncontestable proof yet.
This is the first time Britain have had a BIG cycling team so its natural that the Brits are excited. Its been over 20 years since ANC/Halfords luckily competed in the Tour and they were not a team focused on Euro races. Dimspace is being made out to be gullible and stupid but I would think everyone would know he isnt based on previous posts. He is just having a hard time understanding the negativity surrounding Sky before they have done a thing.
If people want to be negative about a new team who do have dodgy associations and past, lets go and hammer RadioShack or BMC instead of slating Sky. To think I am not even a Sky fan, I actually like Cervelo but have rarely heard anything thrown at them on this forum despite their stellar performances and host of improvers last season.