Am I the only one who questions Cannondale's culpability in the Ted King situation?
With no real GC contender, there was no harm in at least trying to nurse him along a la Sky and Gerraint Thomas.
The team obviously knew how much he had been suffering the prior two days, and they had to know he was in considerable pain at the TTT start, yet he was allowed to start then unloaded after just 2k. In fact, he barely got on the back of the train.
Either you start nine or you don't start nine. If you start nine, then you start all nine to do work, or you start nine in the hopes that the injured rider can possibly contribute (like Thomas did in the second half), or you start nine to nurse the injured rider through the stage with the hope that he can recover over the next stages and contribute later in the Tour.
Allowing a rider to start a TTT, then dropping him after just 2k makes no sense.
With no real GC contender, there was no harm in at least trying to nurse him along a la Sky and Gerraint Thomas.
The team obviously knew how much he had been suffering the prior two days, and they had to know he was in considerable pain at the TTT start, yet he was allowed to start then unloaded after just 2k. In fact, he barely got on the back of the train.
Either you start nine or you don't start nine. If you start nine, then you start all nine to do work, or you start nine in the hopes that the injured rider can possibly contribute (like Thomas did in the second half), or you start nine to nurse the injured rider through the stage with the hope that he can recover over the next stages and contribute later in the Tour.
Allowing a rider to start a TTT, then dropping him after just 2k makes no sense.