Squire said:
Squire said:
Of all the teams I've seen so far, this looks to me to be the best. Maybe because it looks very much like mine

Except Grosu, Vichot and Craddock, ALL riders were at some point in my team this year (not just on the longlist). In the end, we share 22 riders.
@skidmark:
Speaking of Grosu, can you please elaborate on why you took him? He's the only rider in your team I don't get. He's never done anything noteworthy, and is consistently beaten by some rather mediocre names. The only good result I can see is the 4th place in Piemonte last autumn, but then he took his apparent good form to Hainan where he got his ass kicked by second and third rate sprinters. Surely Moser or Peraud, who both would have been a straight replacement, are better picks?
Among your interesting picks I considered Chavanel in the beginning, as he can potentially rip up the French calendar. But he's old, and stated that he wants to enjoy his last year, and target P-N and the Tour. What "enjoy" means to Chavanel is unclear. It could mean he'll attack like crazy and score loads of points everywhere, but I didn't want to risk it in case it would mean he'd parade around French races waving to the crowd and only try a few breakaways in the Tour.
I don't really believe the Formolo hype, and I don't trust his team to help him live up to it. I'm also not convinced by Cort. I like the look of Guillaume Martin, but his team (weird choice of team actually) will not really do many races that'll suit him, and he might end up having his skinny self bumped around on the cobbles too often.
Yeah, for sure, it took a third and fourth look before I decided to take Grosu. Basically, he's the emergent sprinter on a PCT team that's gonna get a ton of invites to smaller races. He got the exact same amount of points in 2015 as 2014 with the move up to harder PCT races, which with linear progress would suggest that next year he'll be better (more than half his points in 2014 came from the Tour of Estonia; 2015 they were spread out, and came toward the end, which shows some progress). How much is the question - a big part of being a neo-pro is learning positioning, and once he had that, he got 3 top 10s in HC races at the end of the season (plus in the early season he was learning the ropes by supporting Colli; I expect him to be the go to guy all season this year). In between those end of season results he had a bunch of DNFs - when he showed up he placed highly. I liked his pattern of results, basically - if he improves and gets more team support and gets an early win and some confidence, he can really fly. I mean, maybe he just makes a modest improvement and ends up with 350 points. But maybe he has a Colbrelli/Drucker/Van Asbroeck kind of year and just cleans up in the second-tier races. That's what I'm hoping for. But if I'm wrong, at least he won't cost me much. Moser has let me down enough that I don't really care to gamble, and I don't see Peraud's ceiling being too high at 38 or whatever he is.
Chavanel I was going to pass on until I actually looked at what he did last year. I mean, I know he said he didn't have fun, but 63 of his last 65 race days (apart from French national Roads and TT) were Grand Tours! That is in-freaking-sane. IAM is stupid, they were in way over their head with the WT license, and forced their best name to show up instead of do what he wants. But Chavanel is the quintessence of the mercurial French talent - he does well when he has fun, he doesn't when he's miserable - his mood matters as much as his form. Sure he's getting old, but he's one year removed from an 1100 point season with that same awful IAM squad. You know what the difference was between 2014 and 2015? His team let him do what he wanted to in 2014. Well that and he did some easier races. It's certainly easier to win Poitou Charentes and Ouest Plouay than to do the grind of 3 GTs and have expect to be fresh to go hunt stages. Hell, he could top 10 Paris-Nice this year, it seems like an easy enough parcours (the easy P-N parcours factored into me picking Vichot too). But yeah, he's an exceptional TTer and stage attacker, and can hang on any given stage. That's a good formula for some opportunistic placings in small stage races or one-days. And he'll have support at Direct Energie - Bernedeau is grateful I am sure.
I feel your concerns on Formolo and Cort, especially with the team support for Formolo. Rohan Dennis proved that Garmin has no clue what to do with their undercard of riders, and his case isn't helped much by swapping Hesjedal/Martin for Rolland/Uran. BUT - he is just so consistent. He got 7th at Suisse as a freakin' neo-pro (which, so did Lopez, and I got him). He got blooded in the GT game last year, came away with a stage and respectable GC showing for a first try. Every single one of his stage race results is between place 9 and 27 (or 31, if you count the Giro). Inch those up 5 spots and you've got someone who scores well. He's been compared to Basso but has shown much more consistency. Anyway, if he's got a GT top 15 and some other GC top 5s in him, I'll be happy. Cort I kind of feel similar to Grosu - took a year to get battered around and got used to it, showed his engine here and there. If he has learned better positioning and endurance, he'll get some good 1-day results and be in the 400-600 range. We shall see. Guillaume Martin I just kind of took a flier on, I like his results and he's on a team without GC threats, so he'll get more encouragement than, say, Jack Haig, who is maybe more talented but will spend his first year working.
Anyway, thanks for asking, clearly I have a bit to say about this, ha. Oh, and welcome back to the game!