Del Toro has been a fabulous pick this year but even as one of my favourite riders there is no way I could consider picking him again next year.
I am nowhere near ruling out SafeBet pulling it off. Don't think the last month of the season will be one of the better ones for Salvarani.There's probably not enough time left to reel @Salvarani back in but Del Toro and Magnier sure are giving it a good go.
Though I was expecting to win the week as the only team with 1-2 in the Vuelta, I do prefer to get my CQ game news from skidmark's updates. But I guess I can't demand that people don't 'spoil' the results beforehand.Wow, that was a really high scoring week! Nearly 2000 points in one week from @Squire.
Personally I am regarding this game very glad, that Riccitello could finish the race and bring his GC points home. It would have been a great shame for this game, if he would have to leave early, considering his good form. So I am also back in the Top5, but I think this will be the highest one, I will have for the rest of the season, as I cannot expect much more points from Vingegaard, van Aert and Gall for the rest of the season.
Only rarer expensive picks of me, which perhaps could score still a bit, are Lipowitz and Demare, although both had been pretty dissapointing this weekend.
For the game, I think @Squire gap to @Salvarani is now 800 points and the one from @SafeBet is more than 1000 points. I would say SafeBet´s team is the best out of these three for the rest of the season, but 1000 points to close is of course a big challenge..
Despite the 400-800 missing points from the spring, he has been as solid a pick as expected. Which reminds me (after the season of both riders is nearly over) of my pre-season bet (when it's only for bragging rights I don't mind bringing it up prematurely again):Btw.: Aside from Salvarani, the overall changed quite a lot compared to a few month ago. Now we have 4 Vingegaard teams in the current Top5. In the beginning of june (Update before the Dauphine) the best placed Vingegaard owner had been on place 16. (@Anderis)
Hmm, interesting... I don't necessarily disagree with your reasoning, but a bet is a fun enough idea. I wouldn't bet on just h2h CQ score, I actually think I'd favour Vingegaard 60-40 on that one (I would have taken Vingegaard if they cost the same, for sure). In terms of profit, I'd lean WvA on that; in terms of % points gained, I'd take WvA for sure. Since I've never had or cared about an avatar, let's just bet for bragging rights that WvA will improve his raw CQ point total more than Vingegaard in 2025 (vice versa for you).
Sorry, didn´t know, that a few of you still don´t use the website of shakes that much. The data is available every new day, so I'm definitely too impatient to wait for the weekly update every week. But if the mayority just don´t want to talk about it, until the weekly update is out, than I can of course also be silent, but given the fact, that it takes sometimes a lot of days until it´s out, it would limit some discussions here..Though I was expecting to win the week as the only team with 1-2 in the Vuelta, I do prefer to get my CQ game news from skidmark's updates. But I guess I can't demand that people don't 'spoil' the results beforehand.
Not trying to silence you, as I can see why people would appreciate the website too. But maybe just don't mention too much about my positions and scores in the future if you can help it.Sorry, didn´t know, that a few of you still don´t use the website of shakes that much. The data is available every new day, so I'm definitely too impatient to wait for the weekly update every week. But if the mayority just don´t want to talk about it, until the weekly update is out, than I can of course also be silent, but given the fact, that it takes sometimes a lot of days until it´s out, it would limit some discussions here..
To be honest, don't really understand the logic behind this, but I will follow your advice and will not mention you in my posts anymore...Not trying to silence you, as I can see why people would appreciate the website too. But maybe just don't mention too much about my positions and scores in the future if you can help it.Not that I am completely oblivious to how I'm doing until skidmark's update happens, of course (my weekly win this week was never in much doubt, and I had a rough idea about the ballpark for the score as well), but it's just a nice way of getting the news 'confirmed' I think. Call me old-fashioned.
![]()
The two best 2006 riders are already pro, though, so I don't actually think next year's crop of neopros looks particularly interesting compared to the norm of recent years. In that sense, 2026 should look more similar to the 2010s than the past few years did, with a comparatively greater emphasis on riders bouncing back as opposed to young talents going through exponential CQ score progression.I started to have a look at riders results this year ahead of next years game an even though the season is not done I will predict that next years game will be completely insane.
There are just sooo many riders that have underperformed this year so that you could probably build 2 completely separate teams and both could probably have an equal chance of doing well.
It will be all come down to what riders will actually regain past glory and how many of those will you have in your team. And on top of that you have the very hyped 2006 generation that are moving into the WT next year.
Agree with this, but I also very much agree with Ingsve's general point. Next year might indeed be a bit of throwback to earlier CQ games, which could be a lot of fun, even though I've been trying to move away from washed-up riders in recent years.The two best 2006 riders are already pro, though, so I don't actually think next year's crop of neopros looks particularly interesting compared to the norm of recent years. In that sense, 2026 should look more similar to the 2010s than the past few years did, with a comparatively greater emphasis on riders bouncing back as opposed to young talents going through exponential CQ score progression.
Yeah still time for riders to have an unexpected strong result in the Worlds or points farm in Japan Cup and Guanxi.Agree with this, but I also very much agree with Ingsve's general point. Next year might indeed be a bit of throwback to earlier CQ games, which could be a lot of fun, even though I've been trying to move away from washed-up riders in recent years.
But there are still quite a few races left, and although I haven't started looking at next year at all yet, I expect some of the current attractive-looking picks to make themselves more unattractive in the remaining month or so of the season.
Rank | Team | Points this week |
1 | Squire | 1995 |
2 | Salvarani | 1673 |
3 | firefly3323 | 1661 |
4 | Amis_Velo | 1560 |
5 | PandaClaws | 1487 |
Rank | Team | Up/down |
1 | firefly3323 | (+16) |
2 | PandaClaws | (+15) |
3 | letstalkcycling | (+13) |
4 | Amis_Velo | (+11) |
5 | ingsve | (+10) |
Rank | Team | Total |
1 | Salvarani | 374 |
2 | Squire | 320.7 |
3 | Pantani4ever | 316 |
4 | Devils_Elbow | 242 |
5 | Rufs | 239 |
Rank | Up/down | Team | Points |
1 | (-) | Salvarani | 14764 |
2 | (+4) | Squire | 13928 |
3 | (-1) | SafeBet | 13659 |
4 | (-1) | Devils_Elbow | 13510 |
5 | (+2) | Earns1985 | 13284 |
6 | (-1) | postmanhat | 13106 |
7 | (+4) | EvansIsTheBest | 13073 |
8 | (+2) | Berflamand | 13006 |
9 | (-1) | triley36 | 12897 |
10 | (-6) | Qazaqstan | 12693 |