Couple more thoughts on this article having read it twice from the online article and the print article now.
-Landis asserts he unwittingly played into the guiding hand of omerta, via calls from LA urging him to stay quiet, canned press conference statements that made him uncomfortable, etc. Yet I find his subsequent prosecution of his innocence to be quite sophisticated and aggressive, from scurrilous calls to LeMond in an effort to silence him, these so-called hacking attempts, book, defense donations, website saying 'they convicted an innocent man'.....I guess someone else engineered all that too.
-Speaking of Omerta. Why isn't Landis REALLY outing everyone he knows something about? The article leads us to believe that Landis found himself on the USPS pro team with no prior experience in doping and Armstrong/Bruyneel taught him how to do it all. Next, he moves on to Phonak and they have no experience with doping? Does anyone here really believe this? Pretty much all doping in cycling began and ends with Bruyneel and Armstrong. Not really an encouraging position for those wanting a cleaner sport, but a wet dream for those wanting to see the destruction of Armstrong.