The Article: WSJ - reopened!

Page 40 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apr 17, 2010
296
0
9,030
I'm making no comment about whether or not I believe what Landis is saying.
I will comment that I have trouble remembering exact details of experiences that happened 3 months ago. We are now asked to believe that Landis has total recall of 2002. How much has Landis factually recalled, and how much has been made to fit a view that he has? It is a fair question. Still, this story continues to get more interesting with each passing week.
 
May 3, 2010
2,662
0
0
BYOP88 said:
Yeah seems the Shack are a little worried and on the topic of Eurosport since when has Harmon been a wannabe Phil or Paul?

Harmon has his head so far up Armstrong's **** it's a wonder he isn't mistaken for a human enema.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Wheels Go Round and Round said:
and so has floyd and EVERY other doper that was caught

again for the slow..........they are ALL DOPERS AT THE TOP OF THE SPORT...............

....and I am asking you why? And where does "at the top of the sport" end?
 
Jul 23, 2009
2,891
1
0
Wheels Go Round and Round said:
.....they are ALL DOPERS AT THE TOP OF THE SPORT...............

That hasn't been the point of the Landis revelations. It's about someone with first hand knowledge exposing Armstrong. It's not a generic "they all do it"; it's a specific "I saw him do it, I helped him do it, and I did it with him."
 
Jul 14, 2009
2,498
0
0
joe_papp said:
For me it was only two times per day - usually early afternoon and evening. So a typical day in California was:

wake-eat-gym-home-eat-jerk it-nap-ride-home-eat-chill-jerk it-sleep; repeat :rolleyes:
Joe don't you think it's a bit bold to say Lance has 7 "dirty" tour victories ? Do I think pro bike racers get a spritz from time to time..yes. Landis looks like the guys on the side of the 405 as cars rip by going 90.."look at that guy he is doing 90!!why are you not going after him"? police usual answer " because I caught you". Landis got caught..he tried to throttle the Shack and The Tour of California. Trying to get a job and a spot for Bahati. I would say from just a few minutes after he got popped and said maybe it was from drinking Jack Daniel's
he started phuking up then and hasn't stopped. Chad has trashed himself and everybody else around him..all the way down to his daughter. He is human garbage and the fact that he and Floyd are fast friends says something about the 2 of them. their career paths will lead them to 1 hr Intervention specials. If King Lance did get a squirt in 2001 Floyd's concern is way too fukin late. The guy is a punk
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Wheels Go Round and Round said:
probably around 185;)

I asked 2 questions - you have given me 1 answer.

So - it is just the riders of the Tour? Not other Pro Tour riders, or in the Pro Conti ranks?

So again - if these 185 riders are doping, and everyone knows this was does Lance deny it?
You realise you are now painting Lance as the liar & Floyd being truthful.

Also you said everyone denied "and so has floyd and EVERY other doper that was caught"..... I think you need to read the WSJ article again.
 
Jul 7, 2009
311
0
0
fatandfast said:
Joe don't you think it's a bit bold to say Lance has 7 "dirty" tour victories ? Do I think pro bike racers get a spritz from time to time..yes. Landis looks like the guys on the side of the 405 as cars rip by going 90.."look at that guy he is doing 90!!why are you not going after him"? police usual answer " because I caught you". Landis got caught..he tried to throttle the Shack and The Tour of California. Trying to get a job and a spot for Bahati. I would say from just a few minutes after he got popped and said maybe it was from drinking Jack Daniel's
he started phuking up then and hasn't stopped. Chad has trashed himself and everybody else around him..all the way down to his daughter. He is human garbage and the fact that he and Floyd are fast friends says something about the 2 of them. their career paths will lead them to 1 hr Intervention specials. If King Lance did get a squirt in 2001 Floyd's concern is way too fukin late. The guy is a punk

this^^^^^^^^^^
 
Jun 18, 2009
1,225
1
0
Wheels Go Round and Round said:
probably around 185;)

I'm going to start a separate thread on this, but I'm going to mention it in response to this point. If you believe Landis, and I just don't see why he'd be lying about it, he got second in the Dauphine while riding clean. So, if you believe Landis, there's definitive proof that you can be competitive in a major stage race riding clean.

Sure, the Dauphine isn't the Tour, but while it's a prep race for Tour contenders, it's also a major objective for guys who aren't. It's certainly a major result. To me, it throws a lot of cold water on the 'it's impossible to compete clean' line of thinking.

My other takeaway from the article is that if Floyd really wanted to ride clean, he could have had a lot of success doing so. He wanted to dope. I appreciate the honesty he seemed to show, though. He didn't claim he was a victim, he put it out there: I was willing to do what it took. I do think it's a giant shame he went down that path.
 
Jul 7, 2009
311
0
0
Dr. Maserati said:
I asked 2 questions - you have given me 1 answer.

So - it is just the riders of the Tour? Not other Pro Tour riders, or in the Pro Conti ranks?

So again - if these 185 riders are doping, and everyone knows this was does Lance deny it?
You realise you are now painting Lance as the liar & Floyd being truthful.

Also you said everyone denied "and so has floyd and EVERY other doper that was caught"..... I think you need to read the WSJ article again.

are you thick?
 
Mar 11, 2009
10,526
3,552
28,180
Wheels Go Round and Round said:
again for the slow..........they are ALL DOPERS AT THE TOP OF THE SPORT...............
I don't quite follow you. You blast Joe for being bitter. Yet you say everyone dopes. So why is it the people who admit to doping are bitter, but those that continue to lie about it are not criticized, but held in esteem? What kind of sport do you want to see? :confused:

Cervelo77 said:
I'm making no comment about whether or not I believe what Landis is saying. I will comment that I have trouble remembering exact details of experiences that happened 3 months ago.
Yes, and no. You will remember large events in your life. I remember when my father suffered his stroke almost four years ago, and can probably tell you the exact date it happened, where I was when I got the phone call, how I felt, etc. But I can't remember which day last week I took ibuprofen, let alone if I took any three years ago and on which day. Floyd thus also may be mistaken as to when he actually did take testosterone, if he was that charged.

Another thing to consider though is that Floyd did say he kept extensive diaries, and Alan Lim made comments on them back in 2006 (only Alan referred to them as training diaries, and now denies everything). So who knows just what is in them?

fatandfast said:
...Landis got caught..he tried to throttle the Shack and The Tour of California. Trying to get a job and a spot for Bahati...
The only problem with this is that it's now been revealed that Floyd had been talking with USAC and USADA long before the TOC and his letters to the promoter were now known to have been written. So the chronological order of Floyd not getting into the TOC motivated him to contact USAC and USADA is incorrect.
 
Mar 11, 2009
10,526
3,552
28,180
I think this is my favorite part from Armstrong's reaction to the WSJ article:

"For years, sensational stories – based on the allegations of ax-grinders -- have surfaced on the eve of the Tour for publicity reasons, and this article is simply no different."

Yes, the WSJ has little credibility, publishing sensational stories like this on a daily basis. Just as in the past ax-grinders like Michael Ashenden have come forth with allegations.

Fascinating that he seems to be the only one who has these "sensational stories" and "allegations" come out against him like this, isn't it?
 
May 20, 2010
169
0
8,830
The "they all dope" argument helps preserve LA's legacy in light of more evidence emerging that LA did in fact dope. "They all doped" so Lance was the best regardless. This is simply not true but it helps reconcile their man-crush with LA's doping. I think public strategies will shift from the they are "bitter and jealous" tactic to the "they all doped" argument (that is, on the forums) as more members of Postal corroborate Flandis' story.
 
Jul 22, 2009
3,355
5
0
Alpe d'Huez said:
I think this is my favorite part from Armstrong's reaction to the WSJ article:

"For years, sensational stories – based on the allegations of ax-grinders -- have surfaced on the eve of the Tour for publicity reasons, and this article is simply no different."

Yes, the WSJ has little credibility, publishing sensational stories like this on a daily basis. Just as in the past ax-grinders like Michael Ashenden have come forth with allegations.

Fascinating that he seems to be the only one who has these "sensational stories" and "allegations" come out against him like this, isn't it?

Some of my favorite highlights of the article...

Rupert Murdoch <3 Team Sky
No dope before USPS for Landis
No dope @ Phonak when Landis got there.
 
Apr 20, 2009
960
0
0
Alpe d'Huez said:
I think this is my favorite part from Armstrong's reaction to the WSJ article:

"For years, sensational stories – based on the allegations of ax-grinders -- have surfaced on the eve of the Tour for publicity reasons, and this article is simply no different."

Yes, the WSJ has little credibility, publishing sensational stories like this on a daily basis. Just as in the past ax-grinders like Michael Ashenden have come forth with allegations.

Fascinating that he seems to be the only one who has these "sensational stories" and "allegations" come out against him like this, isn't it?
wait - this isn't the WSJ's credibility on the line. They are just reporting what they've been told. And they have quite often published stories reporting what others said, and later found that what those people said was wrong.

That doesn't make the WSJ less credible unless they had information to the contrary and chose not to publish it. In this case, they did publish it - the riders who denied doping at USPS.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Wow, there was a race on and you guys were here discussing the WSJ article...I mean, I am especially pointing at the fanboys...isn't part of you whole mantra "you guys only talk about Lance and never ride or do anything but talk about Lance." Um, your hero just put in a good ride. Maybe talk about that instead...on another thread with that topic....you know.....the one on today's stage.:rolleyes:
 
Oct 29, 2009
433
0
0
fatandfast said:
Joe don't you think it's a bit bold to say Lance has 7 "dirty" tour victories ? Do I think pro bike racers get a spritz from time to time..yes. Landis looks like the guys on the side of the 405 as cars rip by going 90.."look at that guy he is doing 90!!why are you not going after him"? police usual answer " because I caught you". Landis got caught..he tried to throttle the Shack and The Tour of California. Trying to get a job and a spot for Bahati. I would say from just a few minutes after he got popped and said maybe it was from drinking Jack Daniel's
he started phuking up then and hasn't stopped. Chad has trashed himself and everybody else around him..all the way down to his daughter. He is human garbage and the fact that he and Floyd are fast friends says something about the 2 of them. their career paths will lead them to 1 hr Intervention specials. If King Lance did get a squirt in 2001 Floyd's concern is way too fukin late. The guy is a punk

I take it you dislike whistleblowers. So does the mafia, communists and closed shops.
 
Jun 15, 2009
835
0
0
BroDeal said:
First, if he transfused half a liter and his total blood volume is usually 5 liters then he put in 10% of the blood he had when he was using testosterone. Whatever was in his transfused blood would be diluted to 10% of its original value. He would have had to have been using a mega dose of testosterone.

Second, testing of FLandis' other TdF samples showed testosterone use throughout the Tour.

Some possibilities:

1) He could be lying about not using testosterone.
2) Something else he was taking contained a substance that tripped the testorone test.
3) Unbenownst to him, someone else was giving him testosterone.
4) The UCI set him up to damage the ASO, which the UCI was feuding with at the time.
5) The carbon isotope test is flawed and can produce false positives.

Testing positive while not knowingly taking testosterone does explain why he fought so hard and expended so much.

I knew the pint of blood constitutes 10% of the blood volume, but I've never read the actual numbers from Landis' test. What you're looking at here is the ratio between Testosterone/Epi-testosterone. In 2006, the general consensus in WADA was that comparing an athlete’s T/E ratio to previous or subsequent samples was much more effective in identifying testosterone doping than using a single T/E ratio in a single urine sample. Thus, Landis' test was probably compared to previous urine samples. Re-introducing his own blood drawn in a period without extra testosterone would give a 10% increase in his urine secretion. Re-introducing his own blood drawn in a period with extra testosterone would further increase his T/E-ratio. Maybe to the extent where he trigger the intra-individual variability threshold deemed natural by the experts at WADA.

Of course, there're the other possible factors you mention to consider as well, but I for one won't dismiss Landis' statements as bogus.
 
May 15, 2010
833
0
0
Thoughtforfood said:
Wow, there was a race on and you guys were here discussing the WSJ article...I mean, I am especially pointing at the fanboys...isn't part of you whole mantra "you guys only talk about Lance and never ride or do anything but talk about Lance." Um, your hero just put in a good ride. Maybe talk about that instead...on another thread with that topic....you know.....the one on today's stage.:rolleyes:

were people actually posting in here during the prologue?

They had better have ZERO interest in the tdf. That is just sad, regardless of where you stand.
 
Jun 10, 2010
19,892
2,252
25,680
scribe said:
No dope before USPS for Landis
No dope @ Phonak when Landis got there.
Why is no one else commenting on this? I'm having more trouble believing Landis now than before reading this article.
 

buckwheat

BANNED
Sep 24, 2009
1,852
0
0
hrotha said:
Why is no one else commenting on this? I'm having more trouble believing Landis now than before reading this article.

Yeah, odd. FLandis says he was second in the Dauphine clean...:confused:
 
Jul 7, 2009
311
0
0
Thoughtforfood said:
Wow, there was a race on and you guys were here discussing the WSJ article...I mean, I am especially pointing at the fanboys...isn't part of you whole mantra "you guys only talk about Lance and never ride or do anything but talk about Lance." Um, your hero just put in a good ride. Maybe talk about that instead...on another thread with that topic....you know.....the one on today's stage.:rolleyes:

can't you afford tivo?:D