Ferminal said:
Typical mindless squad. Bollinger back just three weeks after he was dropped. If they had any idea Copeland would be playing.
Yep, Copeland should be playing. I don't understand why we keep picking late 20's - early 30's pace bowlers when we have some very good young pace bowlers (Copeland, Hazlewood, Starc & Pattinson) coming through. In all fairness Hazlewood, Starc & Pattinson are all coming back from injury, but Copeland should have been picked from at least the 3rd test onwards.
auscyclefan94 said:
Tim Nielsen is so delusional. Then listening to Merv Hughes about the selections you realise how stupid current and past selectors are. Still don't understand how they justify so many of their selections. They said the only reason Hughes was in because the only other good batters at domestic level were not openers. Surely that is a worrying sign if you select a guy that is averaging 20 at domestic level? Supposedly Khawaja has flopped the past 5 innings of sheffield shield cricket? They can't say they are basing selections on bringing in youth because on recent selections they have brought in 'older' guys such as harris and bollinger.
Then we have a captain who is a stubborn little whinger, we appoint a replacement captain to a batsman who is struggling as it is with his batting. It is an absolute mess. I personally don't see what others see in Clarke as a captain. Because he is a 'golden' boy they will never drop him. Because Ponting is captain they will never drop him. They also have brought in guys which after one failure they are dumped and they have barely been given a chance.
But we must admit that England are a very good cricketing team.
England are a good cricket side and play as a unified unit, however our performance has been woeful. We shouldn't have lost 2 matches by an innings.
Although I am an advocate for Hughes, it is worrying that we had to pick someone who was out of form. Now that he's in the team, he has to be given at least another 10 test matches to state his case as a long term opening option for us.
I am excited that Khawaja has been picked (hopefully this is the end of Ponting). He has averaged over 70 in the Shield this year, and scored a quick 78no in his last innings.
Ferminal said:
Nielsen and Hilditch are both funny, hilarious how anyone can support Ponting or Clarke for that matter. If any other batsmen had a series (or a year) like these two they would have been axed two tests ago. It's not just the statistics - neither of them look at all comfortable as #3 and 4 in a test side. Clarke should have been disowned of the T20 captaincy 12 months ago, and thus providing the precedent for someone other than Ricky or Pup to captain an Australian side. Unfortunately they have been fixed on this ridiculous succession plan for 4 years now even though we have been reminded half a dozen times how unsuitable Clarke would be as a future captain.
The idea that either of them should be immune due to their "leadership role" is invalid - given that Ricky is the last person you want educating the future of Australian cricket and Clarke does not have the confidence of himself/the team as a leader.
I don't mind Clarke as a captain from a tactical point of view (he's an improvement on Ponting at least), but he really doesn't seem to have any leadership qualities. The only reason a Captain and/or a Vice-Captain should be immune from being dropped after showing such horrendous form is if their role in that position adds more value to the team than the lack of runs/wickets is costing them (think Stephen Fleming from NZ).