Yeah, no...
watch the stages again. Hinault waited on the Peyresourde for Greg's small chase group to catch up. Hinault did all the work on CDF and ADH.
Even the DS at La Vie Claire had to scream at Lemond to attack for once
Yeah, no...
watch the stages again. Hinault waited on the Peyresourde for Greg's small chase group to catch up. Hinault did all the work on CDF and ADH.
Even the DS at La Vie Claire had to scream at Lemond to attack for once
What do you mean? It is pretty dellusional to think Valverde could beat Froome in the Tour.What do you mean? 2017 was Valverde's best spring season. He was basically unbeatable.
What do you mean? It is pretty dellusional to think Valverde could beat Froome in the Tour.
The same Chris that finished only 54" ahead of Urán ? Froome really was not that impressive in that Tour.What do you mean? It is pretty dellusional to think Valverde could beat Froome in the Tour.
Froome could barely even beat Rigo Uran and lost time to Aru multiple times. It‘s by far his weakest Tour win and Valverde could have stood a chance.What do you mean? It is pretty dellusional to think Valverde could beat Froome in the Tour.
Given that you reasoned that Froome would beat Contador in 2014 based solely on Dauphiné, surely Valverde's performances in Dauphiné in 2017 made him an unlikely contender for the Tour that year?No... There was a lot of talk about that, also because it was a very easy parcours. And Valverde had beaten Contador and Froome on a MTF earlier that year.
And GT double or not, Froome 2017 was not the same Froome as the one from 2012-2015.
Given that you reasoned that Froome would beat Contador in 2014 based solely on Dauphiné, surely Valverde's performances in Dauphiné in 2017 made him an unlikely contender for the Tour that year?
Contador matching Froome on Béal -> He will lose the Tour.
Valverde getting dropped left and right -> He will win the Tour.
Because - get this - Valverde had a far more impressive ITT! (Well, don't look up their respective results ...)
He was beatable throughout the year. Certainly far less impressive than Contador, who distanced him uphill in all races they did together, something Froome couldn't do to Contador.Lol. Nobody could beat Froome in 2014. As I said, in 2017 he was not that rider anymore.
This was the true what-if of that edition.Hell, Porte could have caused Froome serious trouble had he not crashed out.
Is the DS that German dude who said that cycling had nothing to do with physical ability but was purely a mental game and who evidently was in Hinault's camp?
These 2 have just come out of their hyperbaric chambers and the battle is well and truly on!Logic is your Friend vs Elos Anjos post LBL criterium. Honestly it was shaping up to be a big battle.
Remco vs Roglič, Giro 2023
Not a multi mountain stage, but his Catalunya stage win in Lo Port was on a very serious climb and he actually won by being the best climber that day. That's the stage which in my mind is the big outlier. Valverde being hard to drop and then winning in a sprint was quite a normal scenario. Him doing the dropping wasn't.Yeah I don't really believe in Valverde 2017. I think his ITTs were on point that year, but he didn't do big mountain stages until the Dauphine and he wasn't ahead of his Dauphine schedule of previous years.
Froome winning 2014 beyond any doubt is very strong claim with very weak support IMO. There's barely any data points to suggest he was better than Contador in 2014, and for Nibali I don't see how we can't put Hautacam right up there with PSM.
On the other hand there are those who believe that LeMond could have won in 1985 already. There's an easy solution: let them swap Tours and everybody's happy again.Greg was too passive, which is why I think had they been on opposite teams, Hinault wins fairly easily.
On the other hand there are those who believe that LeMond could have won in 1985 already. There's an easy solution: let them swap Tours and everybody's happy again.