The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
frenchfry said:
Props for being right about the real-world implementation of motodoping (motordoping).sniper said:...I don't think motorization is currently widespread at all, but to use 'ethics' or 'risk' as an argument as to why it may or may not have happened, that just doesn't cut it.
this remains dodgy.ray j willings said:I Posted this in the pro gear thread , suspicious ?
http://cyclingtips.com.au/2015/09/movistar-explains-controversial-bike-change-damage-rather-than-a-motor/
he may have played with some motorized device on the ventoux, but other than that? doubtful imo. At least i haven't seen (m)any Froome jumps similar to that one on the Ventoux.Metabolol said:Yeah, Cancellara is an obvious moto doper. Is moto doping how Froome went from nobody to TDF winner?
sniper said:he may have played with some motorized device on the ventoux, but other than that? doubtful imo. At least i haven't seen (m)any Froome jumps similar to that one on the Ventoux.Metabolol said:Yeah, Cancellara is an obvious moto doper. Is moto doping how Froome went from nobody to TDF winner?
Sky would no doubt love to see us shifting the focus on motors, as it would deflect away from their rampant, old school doping for which there is plenty of evidence, whereas the motor discussion would be one big speculation (well, except perhaps for Froome's Ventoux jump away from Contador).