You'll see, Van Eetvelt is simply more talented. If it isn't next season it's the one after. Only thing Van Gils has on Van Eetvelt is a better flat sprint (which is useful in Liège) and way better positioning. Shorter hills aren't a problem for Van Eetvelt, he has the punch en the engine for these races, but his positioning could be problematic. Well and the fact that he won't have a good team around him.
And well, I'm not going to keep having this discussion, but if you still don't see that leaders randomly leaving for rich teams in november after having resigned only 8 months ago isn't a good thing for teams I don't know what to say. I'm not saying that Van Gils will fail at all btw, he's a good rider, but I think his consistency and the way of always getting the best result possible (that isn't a win) is more important for a team like Lotto than Red Bull as they want to be the best team in the world. They don't aim for podiums or top 5's, they want monument wins, and while Van Gils is good and one of the best of the rest, he isn't going to win one when the best riders in the world are participating. If you earn almost 2M a year more WT wins are expected I feel like.