The importance of crank length to the cyclist.

Page 54 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 17, 2009
4,316
2
0
CoachFergie said:
That's what happens when one offers anecdotes as proof of ones position rather than actual evidence.

Martin, every person's pathologies are unique. My top three causes of lower body injuries in cyclists are based on a review of the cycling injury literature that appears to run counter to Frank's top two. Glad you found a solution. The solution to my lower body issues is a double hip replacement.

ok coach google
 
Mar 10, 2009
965
0
0
Martin318is said:
You may not know for sure - but myself and the expert fitter (also a sports physiologist) that made the assessment and determined the cause and solution do.

The person that did my fitting is able to point to before and after analysis to show what part of my pedalling action caused the irritation and that the changes that have been made have not only avoided that irritation but also allowed me to produce more power with less effort.

CoachFergie is the coach who claims pedaling action is of no importance ?
 
Mar 18, 2009
2,553
0
0
FrankDay said:
So much for the rational discussion we were having.

There is nothing rational about pontificating endlessly based a case study of unknown quality while completely ignoring the large amount of data already collected by those with a far better understanding of the topic at hand (case-in-point: your incorrect speculation that widening the distance between the legs will reduce aerodynamic drag).
 
Mar 10, 2009
965
0
0
acoggan said:
Coapman, the troll also known as perfection?



Also known as N Crowley on CyclingForums, no troll, it is fact. I could have included you along with CoachFergie, especially when the topic of cycling related lower back pain is involved. BrimBros PM, when it becomes available, will confirm my claim of maximal torque through 12 o'c is genuine.
 
Apr 21, 2009
3,095
0
13,480
Yawn. Force measuring pedals have been around for a good 30 years or more as has been your chance to prove your opinion on pedalling.
 
Mar 18, 2009
2,553
0
0
As a public service announcement, below are some of the studies Frank could have consulted before performing his experiment. If he had done so, he would have realized that he was really just wasting his (client's?) time comparing a road helmet to just one aero helmet, and instead could have used it to find the aero helmet that worked best for that individual.


1. Kyle CR (1989). The aerodynamics of helmets and handlebars. Cycling Sci 1: 122–125.

2. Chin KY, Lim LK (2001). The design of an aerodynamically sound biker’s helmet. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide.

3. Blair K, Sidelko S (2008). Aerodynamic performance of cycling time trial helmets. In: Estivalet M, Brisson P, eds. The Engineering of Sport 7, New York: Springer, pp. 371-377.

4. Chabroux V, Barelle C, Favier D (2008). Aerodynamics of time trial cycling helmets. In: Estivalet M, Brisson P, eds. The Engineering of Sport 7, New York: Springer, pp. 401-410.

5. Brownlie L, Ostafichukb P, Tews E, Muller H, Brigg E, Franks K (2010). The wind-averaged aerodynamic drag of competitive time trial cycling helmets. Procedia Eng 2: 2419–2424.

6. Chabroux V, Nsi Mba M, Sainton P, Favier D (2010). Wake characteristics of time trial helmets using PIV-3C technique. 15th Int Symp on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics. Lisbon, Portugal, 05-08 July, 2010
 
Mar 10, 2009
965
0
0
CoachFergie said:
Yawn. Force measuring pedals have been around for a good 30 years or more as has been your chance to prove your opinion on pedalling.

Not in this country, I don't like the inconvenience of travelling with equipment. Question, does leverage take effect in the rear sprocket when chain power is transferred to the cogs.
 
Apr 21, 2009
3,095
0
13,480
coapman said:
Not in this country, I don't like the inconvenience of travelling with equipment. Question, does leverage take effect in the rear sprocket when chain power is transferred to the cogs.

Saddest excuse ever. Your opinion has been duly noted:rolleyes:
 
Mar 10, 2009
965
0
0
CoachFergie said:
Saddest excuse ever. Your opinion has been duly noted:rolleyes:



You are the coach but you never give an answer to my questions. It appears that Martin's crank length facts are based on 4 second sprint data. Sprinting is not time trialing and there was no mention of techniques used. For you to get the same torque from one pedal stroke while using the same crank length, rear sprocket and cadence as that which can be got from the perfect TT stroke, I estimate you would have to double your chain ring size. Would varying crank lengths make a significant difference in that case?
 
Sep 14, 2009
6,300
3,561
23,180
Wow

I had a look to see if this thread would be interesting. But there is a lot of silliness going on!

Now I need to run off to the dollar store to buy me some 100 mm cranks :p
 
Mar 10, 2009
965
0
0
Ripper said:
I had a look to see if this thread would be interesting. But there is a lot of silliness going on!

Now I need to run off to the dollar store to buy me some 100 mm cranks :p



Silly was the word used by cycling experts in their description of triathletes who were using aerobars a few short years ago.
 
Sep 14, 2009
6,300
3,561
23,180
coapman said:
Silly was the word used by cycling experts in their description of triathletes who were using aerobars a few short years ago.

Bwa ha ha ha. Bah! Perhaps by traditionalists, but many an expert knew they would be an improvement. There was no real debate in the scientific community as there was evidence, even at the time, of the benefit.
 
Apr 21, 2009
3,095
0
13,480
Ripper said:
Bwa ha ha ha. Bah! Perhaps by traditionalists, but many an expert knew they would be an improvement. There was no real debate in the scientific community as there was evidence, even at the time, of the benefit.

It was an easy theory to test and unlike the Italian TTT or Thierry Marie in 1986, the Hour record, or anything to do with Graeme Obree the UCI didn't see fit to intervene.
 
Sep 14, 2009
6,300
3,561
23,180
CoachFergie said:
It was an easy theory to test and unlike the Italian TTT or Thierry Marie in 1986, the Hour record, or anything to do with Graeme Obree the UCI didn't see fit to intervene.

That was basically my point.

Ah, the good old UCI. They really did not like Obree's innovations, did they? Lucky for us he did not "create" aero bars or they would have been banned as well ;)
 
Mar 10, 2009
965
0
0
Ripper said:
There was no real debate in the scientific community as there was evidence, even at the time, of the benefit.

The same applies to Anquetil's TT pedal stroke but of course unlike the use of aero bars, it could not be copied. By copying the triathletes and their arm rest aero bars, scientists made another serious error because with the use of such bars, any hope of someone else discovering the ideal TT pedaling technique vanished. The ideal and safer aero bars are ' Scott Rake ' type which retain the natural racing body position. Back to crank length: After further consideration I now believe the increase in chain ring size necessary to balance torque output from the natural and ideal tt techniques should be between 50 and 70 %. This increase is required for one to almost double torque in the 2-4 o'c sector which should compensate for the inability to apply max torque between 11-1 o'c (twice per revolution), and to also double torque application between 1-2 o'c. How would a 145 crank cope with such power output.
 
Apr 21, 2009
3,095
0
13,480
coapman said:
The same applies to Anquetil's TT pedal stroke but of course unlike the use of aero bars, it could not be copied. By copying the triathletes and their arm rest aero bars, scientists made another serious error because with the use of such bars, any hope of someone else discovering the ideal TT pedaling technique vanished. The ideal and safer aero bars are ' Scott Rake ' type which retain the natural racing body position. Back to crank length: After further consideration I now believe the increase in chain ring size necessary to balance torque output from the natural and ideal tt techniques should be between 50 and 70 %. This increase is required for one to almost double torque in the 2-4 o'c sector which should compensate for the inability to apply max torque between 11-1 o'c (twice per revolution), and to also double torque application between 1-2 o'c. How would a 145 crank cope with such power output.

Ha ha, what a vivid imagination you have.
 
Sep 14, 2009
6,300
3,561
23,180
coapman said:
By copying the triathletes and their arm rest aero bars, scientists made another serious error because with the use of such bars, any hope of someone else discovering the ideal TT pedaling technique vanished.

???? :confused: Not sure your logic with this?

coapman said:
The ideal and safer aero bars are ' Scott Rake ' type which retain the natural racing body position.

Ummmmmm, no.

coapman said:
Back to crank length: After further consideration I now believe the increase in chain ring size necessary to balance torque output from the natural and ideal tt techniques ...

Are you smoking somethin'?
 
Jul 17, 2009
4,316
2
0
CoachFergie said:
Yawn. Force measuring pedals have been around for a good 30 years or more as has been your chance to prove your opinion on pedalling.

does the word "dogmatic" mean anything to you?
 
Mar 10, 2009
965
0
0
Ripper said:
???? :confused: Not sure your logic with this?


Application of maximal torque through 12 o'c needs independent resistance, the arms supply this, but they cannot do it when they are effectively idling on their rests.
 
Jun 16, 2009
3,035
0
0
coapman said:
Application of maximal torque through 12 o'c needs independent resistance, the arms supply this, but they cannot do it when they are effectively idling on their rests.

but the rider's hands are holding the extensions. There is plenty of opportunity to prodive resistance through that hand position so I dont really see how this causes a loss of the ideal TT position..
 
Sep 14, 2009
6,300
3,561
23,180
Martin318is said:
but the rider's hands are holding the extensions. There is plenty of opportunity to prodive resistance through that hand position so I dont really see how this causes a loss of the ideal TT position..

It wouldn't. I am not sure if Coapman is doing some manner of trolling, or if he/she simply does not understand.
 
Apr 21, 2009
3,095
0
13,480
Noel has been spouting his opinion for the last several years. Based on what he observes from the video footage of Jacques Anquetil. Never supplied any data. Force measuring pedals have been available for decades and any data that a change in force application around the pedal stroke being of any benefit has yet to be found.

Bit like the claimed importance of crank length.

Asker Juekendrup wrote a paper on where to spend your money to really maximise your performance.

http://www.cyclesportcoaching.com/Files/HowToSpendMoney.pdf
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts