The last WT team without a victory contest!

Page 7 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Who will be the last WT team without a victory?

  • Garmin-Barracuda

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
May 20, 2009
8,934
7
17,495
El Pistolero said:
Cheers mate. Didn't know Lampre had 0 victories this season. Then again, no one ever talks about this team :D
Oops, that must have been in Settimana internazionale di Coppi e Bartali which I didn't even look or saw the results :D
 
Oct 23, 2009
5,772
0
17,480
El Pistolero said:
Cheers mate. Didn't know Lampre had 0 victories this season. Then again, no one ever talks about this team :D
I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic, but Ulissi just won two stages in a row so they do have victories now :)

edit: I see I was really late on this one! :p
 
Jun 11, 2011
473
0
0
where and when was BMC's win? sorry for being ignorant, but I thought they were still winless, and why does a stage count? shouldn't it only be the winner of the stage race that gets the team a credit for a win? especially for these smaller, training stage races
 
Oct 15, 2009
179
0
0
CobbleStoner said:
where and when was BMC's win? sorry for being ignorant, but I thought they were still winless, and why does a stage count? shouldn't it only be the winner of the stage race that gets the team a credit for a win? especially for these smaller, training stage races

Today, Critérium International ITT.
 
Aug 29, 2011
3,701
2,090
16,680
CobbleStoner said:
where and when was BMC's win? sorry for being ignorant, but I thought they were still winless, and why does a stage count? shouldn't it only be the winner of the stage race that gets the team a credit for a win? especially for these smaller, training stage races

Your serious?
You seriously don't think stages should count? :rolleyes:
 
Jun 11, 2011
473
0
0
Panda Claws said:
Your serious?
You seriously don't think stages should count? :rolleyes:
for this informal poll of the last team without a win, yes, I think stages should not count. why so serious? :confused::eek::(

I still see BMC failing more than AG2R right now, just because of their budget, if nothing else
 
Apr 10, 2011
4,818
0
0
CobbleStoner said:
for this informal poll of the last team without a win, yes, I think stages should not count. why so serious? :confused::eek::(

I still see BMC failing more than AG2R right now, just because of their budget, if nothing else

Absolutely true. But win is a win afterall. And tbh there's no A2GR's disarray topic :p
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
CobbleStoner said:
for this informal poll of the last team without a win, yes, I think stages should not count. why so serious? :confused::eek::(

I still see BMC failing more than AG2R right now, just because of their budget, if nothing else

Lol if so there would be a whole lot more teams without a win.
Don't be all *confused* *eek!* *frown*
 
Feb 29, 2012
5,765
717
19,680
LaFlorecita said:
Lol if so there would be a whole lot more teams without a win.
Don't be all *confused* *eek!* *frown*

Well actually this could be a good idea

Cavendish will have no wins at all and everybody will be happy! :D
 
Mar 10, 2009
4,707
47
15,530
Who was first, Samu or Cadel? And to be clear, a TT is only finished after the last rider crossed the line ;)
 
Mar 11, 2009
10,062
1
22,485
Arnout said:
Who was first, Samu or Cadel? And to be clear, a TT is only finished after the last rider crossed the line ;)

Well, technically Cadel only won a half stage, so isn't that just half a win?
On second thoughts, let's not go there.:p