zamasailo said:net stream??
I think only for Dutchies and Belgians. Cancellara was able to watch it yesterday though, so I dunnow.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
zamasailo said:net stream??
canyonball said:
It's mainly Vannieuwkerke who is a very bad interviewer. His guests did okay, I think.brollebol said:Just watched it on TV and Emma Johansson looks amazing.
Although I thought the program was pretty boring, they didn't say a lot and seemed shy... No funny/interesting stories and they kept looking at each other.
"Who is going to say something?? - Are you? - Nuh uh.. not me"
Definitely inexperienced with TV appearances.
theyoungest said:It's mainly Vannieuwkerke who is a very bad interviewer. His guests did okay, I think.
theyoungest said:It's mainly Vannieuwkerke who is a very bad interviewer. His guests did okay, I think.
Flamin said:Emma is even more sexy when speaking Dutch. Also funny she said 'jiro' instead of 'Giro'.
Fester said:Well, 6.6w/kg is 6.6w/kg regardless of sex, race, religion...
About 99.9% of men couldn't keep up in a pro tour peloton either. Also there is a lot more to cycling that strength and endurance.
That number is why the question whether she could keep up with the men's peloton has been raised in the first place, so why react (and with such certainty) if you don't even know the basic premise of the discussion.Zoncolan said:I have no idea where you got that number from, but have her or any other woman do a 50 km ITT in under an hour, or climb Alpe d'Huez in under 41 minutes and then I'll admit they're as good as man on the bike.
Nothing I've seen in 20 years of following pro cycling and riding tells me that is the case.
theyoungest said:That number is why the question whether she could keep up with the men's peloton has been raised in the first place, so why react (and with such certainty) if you don't even know the basic premise of the discussion.
Mambo95 said:2. Male cycling is far more competitive. There are lots of very matched riders, so every kilo counts. For the women, less so. That means that a couple of pounds here and there isn't really going to matter. If the men could get away with being less thin, they would.
stefank said:Methinks most of the fat on display is in the heads of the beholders.
Bavarianrider said:Let's face it good looking girls just aren't into cycling.
The ratio of good looking to bad looking is much worse then in other sports.