Too bad he won't give Lombardy a shot, but at least we get to see him on the gravel. 2025 needs to about the MTB after the Spring Classics.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Lombardia is another beast. He can't handle 10 km climbs against UAE. He simply can'tToo bad he won't give Lombardy a shot, but at least we get to see him on the gravel. 2025 needs to about the MTB after the Spring Classics.
Needs to be. Why? I actually hope he would skip that entirely.2025 needs to about the MTB after the Spring Classics.
Same and ive heard he hints at it. He think he can become even better in RR season doing so. And as he is getting older something will have to give he hinted so im expecting it within the next two years.Needs to be. Why? I actually hope he would skip that entirely.
This Lombardia route is by no means easy. MVDP will get absolutely smoked on Sormano no matter what shape he brings, its a very hard climb. As a matter of fact, I have actually done it countless of times and its mostly a 7-8% climb for 10 km into a small plateau lowering the avg. gradients and then kicking up towards the end. Way, way out of his league IMO, but if you believe in fairytales..
No way he gets top 3...not even in my dreams (i like him as a racer quiet a lot but we need to be realistic).There's no official confirmation of his participation yet. Gravel WC is surely on his menu. If he starts then yeah, it will be difficult. Pogacar will be unreachable but under some good circumstances (he manages to catch a strong chasing group on the descent) MVP might get top3 there. It will be harder to achieve than during this WC and I think it's more likely he won't make it to the podium. Top10 is more realistic.
he might have won Lombardia in the era that Bettini and Gilbert won it. Different course and different riders now
Bettini and Gilbert were better climbers than MVP (specially Bettini).he might have won Lombardia in the era that Bettini and Gilbert won it. Different course and different riders now
They are very much in their right as well. Something like drafting and subsequent punishment leaves room and is always up for interpretation. Riding on the pavement, otoh, is not. The rulebook is clear, Van der Poel should be DQ'd.Sounds like his naughty boy riding on the pavement fun has not been forgotten.
Latvian president asking why he was not DQ for endangering spectators.
Yeah, I can't disagree with that. Guilty, and should have been DSQ within 5-10 mins. It was that blatant......They are very much in their right as well. Something like drafting and subsequent punishment leaves room and is always up for interpretation. Riding on the pavement, otoh, is not. The rulebook is clear, Van der Poel should be DQ'd.
I'm sure it's really about the spectators for the Latvian cycling federation, and not about their guy potentially finishing on the podium if MVDP got disqualifiedSounds like his naughty boy riding on the pavement fun has not been forgotten.
Latvian president asking why he was not DQ for endangering spectators.
Does it really matter? I doubt that Skujins would have gotten the same latitude if he was the one caught on tv riding on the pavement.I'm sure it's really about the spectators for the Latvian cycling federation, and not about their guy potentially finishing on the podium if MVDP got disqualified
And what's wrong with that exactly? I love Mathieu, but he should have been disqualified. And Latvia brings up a good point: if bigger names get punished less, smaller cycling nations like themselves will be at a disadvantage even more.I'm sure it's really about the spectators for the Latvian cycling federation, and not about their guy potentially finishing on the podium if MVDP got disqualified
Wouldnt be good for sport to punish cheating if the cheater is popular enoughIf the UCI comms really said 'it wouldn't be good for the sport' to have DQ MVDP for breaking the rules, that's a particularly worrying statement in one of the sports most important races and one actually organised by UCI itself rather than a Race Organiser directly.
I don't like them pretending that they're doing this for the greater good when they have a clear personal stake in this. It makes it a bit hypocritical. Whether MVDP gets DQ'ed or not, I couldn't care less, and I doubt he does either.And what's wrong with that exactly? I love Mathieu, but he should have been disqualified. And Latvia brings up a good point: if bigger names get punished less, smaller cycling nations like themselves will be at a disadvantage even more.
That's actually what I meant with 'bigger names': bigger riders.I don't like them pretending that they're doing this for the greater good when they have a clear personal stake in this. It makes it a bit hypocritical. Whether MVDP gets DQ'ed or not, I couldn't care less, and I doubt he does either.
I don't think it really matters about how big the cycling nation is, after all Nils Eekhoff got robbed of a world title a few years ago and he's Dutch. If there is a double standard, it's probably more about how big the rider is. Pogi would probably get a free pass as well.