- Aug 13, 2009
- 12,854
- 2
- 0
Race Radio said:Tignanello is actually a Sang/Cab blend from Tuscany. As far as warped bottles I have a bottle of this saved for the plea bargain.
![]()
Cimacoppi49 said:What is Anderson's handle here?
thehog said:I know. He used the "I'll help your friend with cancer if you could let this one go" more than once.
It wasn't always forthcoming.
I'm heading to the garage to find my papers. I think they're buried underneath an old rusting Peugeot Reynolds 501 frame.
TexPat said:Why? Would you like to send me a bottle of the Tignanello?
[IMG said:YES they do and Travaglini is by far the best bottler of the stuff; it is one of my favorite wines. It's basically a Barolo without the price tag. I had a case of their 1997 crop ONCE, sadly, they are all gone now!
TexPat said:It's an expensive flight back to the US--wouldn't that be a waste of tax payers' money?
TexPat said:It's an expensive flight back to the US--wouldn't that be a waste of tax payers' money?
sartain said:Perhaps LA will send his G450 to shuttle you back AND stock the thing with his favorite wine for you to sip on?
TexPat said:It's an expensive flight back to the US--wouldn't that be a waste of tax payers' money?
sartain said:Perhaps LA will send his G450 to shuttle you back AND stock the thing with his favorite wine for you to sip on?
TexPat said:I've been on some long flights, but I'd bet that would be the longest ever.
Pass.
Even the joke gives me the creeps.
So that´s why he hauled another guy aboard?Race Radio said:Funny story about Armstrong's jet. It is not a G450 but a 15 year old G-IVSP. He bought it about two years ago, right before the bottom dropped out of the private jet market. It lost at least $5 million in value over the space of a year. If he thought his legal fees were expensive wait until the engine overhaul and they discover the corrosion issues that are common on those planes....$1 million per engine.
Bilirubin said:Agreed. We're already getting drunken posts about hookers and blow at training camps from some of the more deranged critics. Just imagine what this place will be like when the indictments come?
For some people seeing Armstrong in court is the main event in their lives, far bigger than any grand tour. Sad really.
jimmypop said:You exaggerate the claims made here in order to diminish the actual points. It's a PR firm, yes, but one tied integrally with Armstrong. This same firm seeds discussion boards and has the same employees jumping in the comments on Armstrong articles. To be fair, other PR firms are doing this as well these days.
CIA or Mossad? Hardly. Insidious? Surely.
Bilirubin said:It's a delusion. How many followers does Armstrong have on twitter? He many fans does he have around the world? He doesn't need people to go on cycling message boards that appeal to only a small section of people. It's a misunderstanding of how PR firms work. You and others have convinced yourselves by repetition this is true.
Race Radio said:Funny story about Armstrong's jet.
jimmypop said:Is LiveStrong a scam? No, but it's hardly a top-notch charity by any metric.
bilirubin said:dude, you really need to take a step back. It doesn't look good.
Cimacoppi49 said:Do you think Jonathan Littman at the Huffington Post is a PR flack for Armstrong? I suggested as much and he did not approve my comments.![]()
Bilirubin said:The thing is, that's not true. Most charity experts say it's one of the best out there and has done a huge amount to unite the other cancer charities. Armstrong does a lot of work behind the scenes that he simply wouldn't have to do if what some assert is true.
Recent article here:
http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/150/can-livestrong-survive-lance.html
If the case against Armstrong is so good then people shouldn't have to lapse into delusion and frankly sociopathic behaviors to bolster this case. It's not as black and white as the more paranoid obsessive critics would have you believe. The world is full of grey.
Bilirubin said:The thing is, that's not true. Most charity experts say it's one of the best out there and has done a huge amount to unite the other cancer charities. Armstrong does a lot of work behind the scenes that he simply wouldn't have to do if what some assert is true.
Recent article here:
http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/150/can-livestrong-survive-lance.html
If the case against Armstrong is so good then people shouldn't have to lapse into delusion and frankly sociopathic behaviors to bolster this case. It's not as black and white as the more paranoid obsessive critics would have you believe. The world is full of grey.