- Jul 20, 2010
- 1
- 0
- 0
Just wanted to chime in, being somewhat new to the spectator side of things.
I see no reason why Contador shouldn't have continued on, regardless of whether he knew Schleck had mechanical problems or not. This isn't an ethical issue for a racer, it's an ethical issue for fans. A racer's ethos is the win - pure and simple. As a spectator, if you can't accept that racers are necessarily single minded then maybe you should watch something else.
Fans would like to have their cake and eat it too. You want these guys to play politics while they're outputting half the power of a microwave for five hours straight. In addition to that, you love your heros when they make superhuman achievements but want them to just be ordinary guys who never use PEDs or do anything extraordinary to get that 'superhuman' edge over 'ordinary'. No, I see absolutely nothing wrong with the ethos of win, but rather an ethical problem in the collective mind of fans.
Maybe Schleck had mechanical; maybe he mis-shifted and is too embarrassed to admit it; maybe Contador was just blithely following the sprint of his teammate and did/didn't see Schleck having trouble, but who cares? Schleck dropped - and ultimately whether skill, luck, or morality was involved, the outcome is logical.
Just accept cycling as the highly individualized, win focused sport that it is, or spectate a sport like golf where people always have time to be polite.
I see no reason why Contador shouldn't have continued on, regardless of whether he knew Schleck had mechanical problems or not. This isn't an ethical issue for a racer, it's an ethical issue for fans. A racer's ethos is the win - pure and simple. As a spectator, if you can't accept that racers are necessarily single minded then maybe you should watch something else.
Fans would like to have their cake and eat it too. You want these guys to play politics while they're outputting half the power of a microwave for five hours straight. In addition to that, you love your heros when they make superhuman achievements but want them to just be ordinary guys who never use PEDs or do anything extraordinary to get that 'superhuman' edge over 'ordinary'. No, I see absolutely nothing wrong with the ethos of win, but rather an ethical problem in the collective mind of fans.
Maybe Schleck had mechanical; maybe he mis-shifted and is too embarrassed to admit it; maybe Contador was just blithely following the sprint of his teammate and did/didn't see Schleck having trouble, but who cares? Schleck dropped - and ultimately whether skill, luck, or morality was involved, the outcome is logical.
Just accept cycling as the highly individualized, win focused sport that it is, or spectate a sport like golf where people always have time to be polite.