Exactly, so why don't they try to institute new protocals to mitigate the inherent perils of being a professional cyclist? Cycling, by nature, is "reckless." It is when bombing down a mountain at full speed, it is when fighting for position to launch a well timed sprint, likewise when (frequently) entering into that zone of extreme fatigue that hampers lucidity, which, in turn, can unintentionally lead to accidents.I guess I just consider accident to be anything that wasn't done with purpose. Sometimes - quite frequently, I guess - accidents are just caused by lack of thinking.
I wouldn't even call it reckelessness in the same way it would be reckless to drive a quad bike down a skijumping slope (please do not attempt!), it was just... well... not realising that something was a possible consequence of an action. Because, was it really that foreseeable? TT training out on the roads is nothing new, most of the time nothing has happened. This one times, unfortunately, a bus stopped in front of a rider. In fact, you could even argue that it wouldn't even have mattered if he'd frequently been looking up to check that the road was clear, or even been looking up most of the time; he was looking down at the most critical moment.
Also, I still think that the most important concern in the Bernal thread is, well, Bernal. Sure, none of us - afaik - can actively do anything about his recovery, but we can still express worry, sympathy, and now even admiration: He's frikkin' back on a (stationary) bike already!
An amatuer out on his/her 15,000 euro toy doing what Bernal did is reckless, a pro training a time trial for the Tour de France no. He has no choice but to place himself in the new radical position, whilst testing at once his resistence to fatigue and capacity to maintain lucidity. That's not being reckless in the context of what he is paid to do. It's called doing his job. The problem was that nobody in the sport or his team considered the ramifications, in terms of increasing the chances of accidents, of pursuing the science of performance to the maximum degree in the context of time trialing praxis. Thus Bernal's egregious mistake must be contextualized as a circumstantial error, which caused the accident, that was contingent upon professional and team demands and not on his shoulders alone. At the very minimum somebody from the team staff should have been on a motorcycle some 70 meters ahead in radio contact with Bernal alerting to immanent danger.
That this wasn't the case is doubtless because time trialing should be the "safest" discipline in the sport, right? No peleton, no chaotic scenarious, just one guy alone on his bike. What could go wrong? Surely now they will all have learned from this and new measures shall be taken.
Last edited: