- Mar 22, 2010
- 908
- 0
- 0
Publicus said:Not the last chance. He's going to race the Tour de Suisse.
I stand corrected.
Publicus said:Not the last chance. He's going to race the Tour de Suisse.
BikeCentric said:Is fatty Pharmstrong no longer racing the Tour de Suisse?
There is simply no way he's going to be competitive at Le Tour when he's now getting spanking by skinny little climbers (Tommy D.) and U-23 riders in an ITT. Stick a fork in him, he's done. I don't care how many needles Ferrari injects in the old man, he's got nothing left.
kurtinsc said:I don't think he's got enough left to win the Tour by any stretch.
But based on his past increases in performance from early season results to June/July form... I think he'll still put in a respectable peformance come July. Probably a top 7-8 finish, in contention for the final podium spot.
Yeah.. not an impressive TT. But he TT'd equal to Vino in the short Criterium International TT earlier in the seaon and was ahead of Zabriskie (who crushed him today) in Murcia.
He'll probably get whatever he always had done in May or early June, and we'll see him near the front come July.
kurtinsc said:Kind of an annoying interface though... you have to go to the team each year and search the team results to find results for the rider? Bleh. I prefer this one:
http://www.cyclingwebsite.net/coureurs.php
Anyway, I didn't see anything I left off in the first list. Unless you want stage wins too... then there's a few in the races I listed already, a 2nd in a Murcia TT in 2003, a stage win in Tour du Languedoc-Rousillon in 2004 (never heard of this race), a stage win in Algrave in 2004 and a couple of 3rd places in the 2005 Tour of Georgia.
Again... not saying he's even done that well this year... but saying he "dominated" before June in any of his Tour winning seasons is just false.
Dr. Maserati said:Who said he "dominated" before June"?
I have checked back the last 5 pages of this thread and did a search for the word "dominated" and besides your post the last was in March.
More to the point - you are using 'results' and finishing places as your 'barometer' for Lance's previous season's - this is flawed.
A quick example - LA finished The Tour of Flanders in 2005 in 28th, this year he finished better in 27th. But finishing times would be a closer reflection than placings so lets have a closer look - in 2005 he was @ 2:04, in 2010 he was @ 2:35. So he is in the ballpark.
One thing about looking solely at results is that it does not give an accurate account of the race.
In 2005 LA was working very hard for Hincapie and did a lot of turns at the front chasing down the break - until he blew with a little over 20k to go after doing a solid days work.
In 2010 he was TRS main man - so had protected status. While his result in RVV was good, in the context of previous years he is behind on his form.
I don't doubt that - but I dunno why he would sandbag for the first half of the season instead of getting god racing miles in?
Doesn't he like to win big races? Wasn't his whole aura during his heyday based on the premise that he was an unstoppable force - that nothing his opponents could do would matter - he would crush you in the first ITT and his train would launch him on the first mountain top finish and you would spend the rest of the race playing catch-up.
Beech Mtn said:LA and his girlfriend are expecting another child, due in October. The miracle continues.
kurtinsc said:This is what I was referring to
Perhapse I read this wrong, but I interpreted it as stating that he didn't "sandbag for the first half of the season" in the past, and that in all the races he rode during the year he was the "unstoppable force".
Perhaps the problem was my interpretation. The fact is he was never "unstoppable" except in July (and in some years June). He was a rider who rarely showed much until his big race... the Tour. I'm not sure how much his performance now indicates that he'll be horrific in July. Yeah... it's not great and probably not up to what he did in some past years... but he was never "unstoppable" outside of his peak months.
Arnout said:Nice for them.
I think its a bit of a pity that behavior towards Lance is so negative overhere. I mean, after all he's the man who won seven Tours and took the gamble to come back, and did it quite respectable (to come in third in le Tour is respectable by any means and for any rider except Contador. To come in third after three kind of vacation years when aged 38 is even better).
I mean, he's the one who is riding and who is suffering. We are the ones who are judging him from behind our screens. I think it is very brave that he decided to come back and to come back at this level and I respect him for that. A lot.
However, and that's the tricky bit, he's not behaving himself. We all know the stories of last year and how he's behaving when he loses out on someone. Not good. But that doesn't mean that everything that his Lanceness does is negative or wrong.
I am not a Lance supporter by any means, not a Contador supporter either. The behavior of Lance caused more sympathy towards Contador, but I respect both riders. And I think both riders, Lance included, deserve that.
Arnout said:Nice for them.
I think its a bit of a pity that behavior towards Lance is so negative overhere. I mean, after all he's the man who won seven Tours and took the gamble to come back, and did it quite respectable (to come in third in le Tour is respectable by any means and for any rider except Contador. To come in third after three kind of vacation years when aged 38 is even better).
I mean, he's the one who is riding and who is suffering. We are the ones who are judging him from behind our screens. I think it is very brave that he decided to come back and to come back at this level and I respect him for that. A lot.
However, and that's the tricky bit, he's not behaving himself. We all know the stories of last year and how he's behaving when he loses out on someone. Not good. But that doesn't mean that everything that his Lanceness does is negative or wrong.
I am not a Lance supporter by any means, not a Contador supporter either. The behavior of Lance caused more sympathy towards Contador, but I respect both riders. And I think both riders, Lance included, deserve that.
BikeCentric said:Is fatty Pharmstrong no longer racing the Tour de Suisse?
There is simply no way he's going to be competitive at Le Tour when he's now getting spanking by skinny little climbers (Tommy D.) and U-23 riders in an ITT. Stick a fork in him, he's done. I don't care how many needles Ferrari injects in the old man, he's got nothing left.
luckyboy said:
Berzin said:No reason to think otherwise, and I hope the reality of this situation holds firm.
But if this guy comes out riding like gangbusters at the Tour, it will show the world how truly screwed cycling is.
He may not have performed well in seasons past during his Tour run-ups, but he's much older now. How could it be at all possible that he shows up to the Tour and compete against guys who've been racing all damn year?
luckyboy said:
luckyboy said:
Scott SoCal said:Today's Gila TT. I think this speaks volumes.
http://velonews.competitor.com/2010/04/news/sergent-shocks-stars-at-gila-tt-leipheimer-leads_113849/attachment/tour-of-the-gila-2010-8
He may need to switch from Shiner Bock to Mich Ultra. Crash diet time...
Dr. Maserati said:C'mon 'Scott'.....it's only April.
Dr. Maserati said:What I find disturbing is that 'Cinco' has almost 1700 followers!
