The Official LANCE ARMSTRONG Thread 2010-2011

Page 50 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
ErmOkk said:
Didn't he say he was at 71kg at the 2009 TdF? He looked like an anorexia boy there with his collapsed cheeks :s So no, he's definately not at the weight now, seeing he still has way about the same amount of muscle mass...

The dauphine will be a good indicator though.

Not to my knowledge. His listed weight was 75 kg.

http://www.letour.fr/2009/TDF/RIDERS/us/coureurs/22.html

And I agree with you. He looked like he was in phenomenal shape at the Tour.
 
The craziest thing for me is the follow vehicle. Now granted, I have not seen that many pro 'superstars' training, but when you see a couple of riders being followed by an SUV, it is a bit odd! (note: the shoulder on much of the Queen K is wide enough for the SUV to follow right behind without being in the way of other traffic)
 

Polish

BANNED
Mar 11, 2009
3,853
1
0
The Low Weight and High Cadence transformations that carried Lance to his TdF Victories earlier this century are a thing of the past.

Lance has transformed back into the Pedal Mashing Chubby Chub Chub of his early years. Lance is also not so anal about weighing his food nor does he chase and stare down the dopers like Ricco to teach them lessons anymore.

Lance has mellowed - and you can tell this comeback thing is grounded in his love of the sport of bicycling. And keeping the LAF momentum going.

Lance is pushing FORTY years old - he is not going to win the TdF lol.
But it is sure entertaining watching him try isn't it?
 
Polish said:
The Low Weight and High Cadence transformations that carried Lance to his TdF Victories earlier this century are a thing of the past.

Lance has transformed back into the Pedal Mashing Chubby Chub Chub of his early years. Lance is also not so anal about weighing his food nor does he chase and stare down the dopers like Ricco to teach them lessons anymore.

Lance has mellowed - and you can tell this comeback thing is grounded in his love of the sport of bicycling. And keeping the LAF momentum going.

Lance is pushing FORTY years old - he is not going to win the TdF lol.
But it is sure entertaining watching him try isn't it?

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that you are sharing an opinion here, one not consistent with the LiveStrong Message and therefore not a valid opinion. In the future we would appreciate it if you could stick to the script. LiveStrong and Prosper! :p
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Ripper said:
The craziest thing for me is the follow vehicle. Now granted, I have not seen that many pro 'superstars' training, but when you see a couple of riders being followed by an SUV, it is a bit odd! (note: the shoulder on much of the Queen K is wide enough for the SUV to follow right behind without being in the way of other traffic)

That's either:

a) to carry the paid LA "fans" and drop them at strategic positions to scream "Yay, go Lance, it's the pyreneens, yay" as he cycles past, even though they clearly wouldn't be able to see who it is from the distance they start screaming; or

b) to carry the massive "Lance Armstrong - Cheer Now" sign and arrow pointing to him in bright neon for said paid LA "fans" to start cheering.

:p
 
Oct 29, 2009
1,095
0
0
Publicus said:
LiveStrong and Prosper! :p

LMAO

2217389658_902e6b642d.jpg
 
Feb 12, 2010
66
0
0
Ya so I watched the clip, and that has a look of 40 year old back fat to me.:eek:

Why do we do this to ourselves?
Sort of like being a Michael Jackson watcher (when he was alive)...we do it for the train wreck...everybody loves a train wreck
 
Hibbles said:
That's either:

a) to carry the paid LA "fans" and drop them at strategic positions to scream "Yay, go Lance, it's the pyreneens, yay" as he cycles past, even though they clearly wouldn't be able to see who it is from the distance they start screaming; or

b) to carry the massive "Lance Armstrong - Cheer Now" sign and arrow pointing to him in bright neon for said paid LA "fans" to start cheering.

:p

LOL ... actually it is probably to film everything for PR or to make some money (hey, a 'documentary'!), and to measure every minutia of data of his ride. Oh, and perhaps to get some attention ;)
 
Wolves-Lower said:
Ya so I watched the clip, and that has a look of 40 year old back fat to me.:eek:

Why do we do this to ourselves?
Sort of like being a Michael Jackson watcher (when he was alive)...we do it for the train wreck...everybody loves a train wreck

Are you talking 'bout the TT video, or hillclimb?
 

Polish

BANNED
Mar 11, 2009
3,853
1
0
Hibbles said:
That's either:

a) to carry the paid LA "fans" and drop them at strategic positions to scream "Yay, go Lance, it's the pyreneens, yay" as he cycles past, even though they clearly wouldn't be able to see who it is from the distance they start screaming; or

b) to carry the massive "Lance Armstrong - Cheer Now" sign and arrow pointing to him in bright neon for said paid LA "fans" to start cheering.

:p

It is sad that lance had to ferry and plant those two fans up there to cheer him on. Lance should learn how to use that twtter thingy to attract attention.
He probably could have attracted ten people at least - and maybe they could have drove themselves too.

Lance also was outclimbed by a cow. Thats sad too.
 
Polish said:
It is sad that lance had to ferry and plant those two fans up there to cheer him on. Lance should learn how to use that twtter thingy to attract attention.
He probably could have attracted ten people at least - and maybe they could have drove themselves too.

Lance also was outclimbed by a cow. Thats sad too.

Now that was sad.
 
Sep 2, 2009
589
1
0
theswordsman said:
A link to photos and videos of the Armstrong Lieto TT race.

http://www.biciciclismo.com/cas/site/noticias-ficha.asp?id=22873





karlboss said:
9 seconds over 14 miles. 72 seconds over 112...yep that'll cover lance's deficit in the swim and run to mix it with the ironman pros in his new career. Would be more interested to see the result if they both put in an effort.





Thank you for posting this.

open question 14 miles equals 22.5 km right?

then how can this finish time (18' 35'') be correct:



http://twitpic.com/13t6bo



I really hate the tape covering the Watt number.
 
Bike Boy said:
Thank you for posting this.

open question 14 miles equals 22.5 km right?

then how can this finish time (18' 35'') be correct
:

http://twitpic.com/13t6bo

I really hate the tape covering the Watt number.

It can't possibly be. R*T=D R= 56.4KM T= .3058333 (18'35"/60) produces a distance of 17.249KM or just under 10.7 miles (17.249*.62). But I've been told that micro-analyzing of Lance Armstrong's twits, videos and statements is not permitted. Let us celebrate in his achievement of beating a tri-athlete who swam three miles before the TT by a whopping 9 seconds. All Hail Lance! LiveStrong and Prosper!!!! :cool:
 
Publicus said:
It can't possibly be. R*T=D R= 56.4KM T= .3058333 (18'35"/60) produces a distance of 17.249KM or just under 10.7 miles (17.249*.62). But I've been told that micro-analyzing of Lance Armstrong's twits, videos and statements is not permitted. Let us celebrate in his achievement of beating a tri-athlete who swam three miles before the TT by a whopping 9 seconds. All Hail Lance! LiveStrong and Prosper!!!! :cool:

Guys the wind on the Queen K was insane yesterday. Likely a steady 40 kph with gusts in the 60's. Would've been a tailwind the whole way.
 
Sep 2, 2009
589
1
0
Publicus said:
It can't possibly be. R*T=D R= 56.4KM T= .3058333 (18'35"/60) produces a distance of 17.249KM or just under 10.7 miles (17.249*.62). But I've been told that micro-analyzing of Lance Armstrong's twits, videos and statements is not permitted. Let us celebrate in his achievement of beating a tri-athlete who swam three miles before the TT by a whopping 9 seconds. All Hail Lance! LiveStrong and Prosper!!!! :cool:

Thanks.

If I'm not mistaken you are being sarcastic now?

Obviously the math is very strait forward, but I was not sure whether the speed number visible on the pic had anything to do with the average speed, but thanks for clarifying that.
 
Bike Boy said:
Thanks.

If I'm not mistaken you are being sarcastic now?

Obviously the math is very strait forward, but I was not sure whether the speed number visible on the pic had anything to do with the average speed, but thanks for clarifying that.

I think in the post-TT video Armstrong says he averaged 56.4KMPH. So unless the laws of physics/mathematics have changed, the route wasn't 14 miles. And yes, I was being sarcastic (poking fun at another forum member who's handle I'm not going to get right).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.