The Official LANCE ARMSTRONG Thread 2010-2011

Page 69 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 9, 2009
7,879
1,289
20,680
Oldman said:
Thanks for the recount as I've not kept up. You could probably create an activity chart for the rise and decline of posts from each incarnation but that, too; would be a waste of electrons.

That was TFF's ignore list, not all of those were this guy (as TFF sometimes falls out with other people[I know, hard to believe for someone who has "tniartser" tatooed on his chest]:D) nor is this a complete list of all of Prodigal Son's past incarnations.
Let me present a partial list (I know I missed some as it is from memory):
Arbiter
Ban Pro Cycling
British Pro Cycling
Unban Pro Cycling
Max Power
Rex Hunter
Sprocket
Sprocket01
Sprocket02
Sprocket999
Great White
Slayer
Stealth
Prodigy
Prodigal Son
(In no particular order)
It is really an amazing body of work, and shows the lengths a disturbed mind will go to to escape at least for a short while from the cellar room he lives in under his parents house.

oh yeah I forgot Bristol Pro Cycling
 
Aug 3, 2009
3,217
1
13,485
No activity for awhile. Mom must have yelled down that the TV dinners are ready...

bro_guns.jpg
 
Nov 24, 2009
1,601
0
0
blackcat said:
WonderLance?

I think not. WonderLance is a different beast. I think it is a regular member who just wants to let off steam occaisionally... I mean having a CarbonCrank as the image during CC's period, being incredibly ironic in most posts... No, it think WonderLAnce is a different and far cleverer user. Or maybe I am giving someone too much credit. Thats just my feeling about him.

So, Is Carbon Crank part of the BPC line? And what about Jackhammer? Because Pordigy posted that image from Ohio that was done by CC orginally?
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
Big GMaC said:
So, Is Carbon Crank part of the BPC line? And what about Jackhammer? Because Pordigy posted that image from Ohio that was done by CC orginally?

I posted that picture in one of Prodigy's post. Sorry for the confusion

Jackhammer and Carboncrank were the same people.
 
Mar 11, 2009
10,526
3,596
28,180
Prodigy is the same as the others in that giant list, and either from England, or piggybacking on a proxy from there. Yes, it is astounding that one person would register some 20-odd times after getting repeatedly banned, but true. Pathetic, actually.

CarbonCrank is a different person and from the Midwestern US. Perhaps the same person as Jackhammer (though not as violent, so far). I haven't looked enough into this to verify, but will in time.
 
Feb 24, 2010
34
0
0
Dr. Maserati said:
Nice long post.... which again didn't answer my question.

Yes I did. I explained why your claim that Armstrong has done less for cancer over the past two years than a post on an internet forum - honest and noble as that post is - is wrong.

His return raises his profile and his bank account.

Yes that's true. You should stick to criticising him for this. Personally I don't have a problem with him not working for free for the advertisers, who gained massively from his appearances, but at least it's a fact that he did earn money. It did happen.

Do you not think it is telling that in the 18 months since he announced his comeback for 'Cancer Awareness' that you are unable to show a statement or a link to something practical that he has done?

You're trying to turn it around and make it my duty to rake through interviews to answer what is a straw man question. It's up to you to prove that Armstrong, who has one of the most famous and inspirational cancer stories of all time, has raised millions for cancer, worked with governments and raised the profile of cancer massive over the last two years, has done less for cancer awareness than a post on an internet forum.

Again - Patricks honest story, for no reward - is a better example of inspiration and practical help than LA has done since his return.

You're spinning it again. You did not say it was a better example. You said this post on this thread has done more for cancer than Armstrong over the last two years. If you've changed your position then fair enough, but you shouldn't have stood by the claim when I asked you about it. The claim is the type of bad faith that discredits the anti Armstrong movement.

I think I've been quite fair with you here. All I have done is criticise this remarkable statement.
 

ravens

BANNED
Nov 22, 2009
780
0
0
BroDeal said:
The non-ideal solution is to ban him as soon as he reappears, not wait until the situation becomes intolerable. Give the non-employee moderators ban privileges with a directive that it should only be used to get rid of this turd from Ohio.

The proper solution is to have the admin deal with it. The sys admin here is either incompetent or too busy to deal with the problem. The situation does not require an innovative solution. Every forum of note has to deal with kooks like this.

Admins, punch the little buttons....I am sitting here going, "Why the eff is he still not banned?". Please people, just don't respond. I don't think banning is too complicated, this disturbed person has given the mods ample practice.

I wonder if there is some forum for like, sewing or knitting or something like that with a different kook. It just sounds funny to me, but that is probably the case. (The PILLOWcase that is!!! ouch, that was awful)
 
Feb 24, 2010
34
0
0
Alpe d'Huez said:
Prodigy is the same as the others in that giant list, and either from England, or piggybacking on a proxy from there.

You're saying because I'm from England I must be the same person as someone else with a totally different IP address? There are 70 million people in the UK.

As you can see, I have doggedly stuck to the issue and not responded to any of the trolling here, which seems to be a free for all with no moderation. That's fine, I'm a big boy, but if you have a problem with something I have said, a comment I have made, or a rule I have broken, then please highlight it. I will be only too happy to correct it.

If not, then I would kindly hope that at least a moderator would not join in with the trolling. This is supposed to be an Armstrong topic thread, isn't it?
 

Polish

BANNED
Mar 11, 2009
3,853
1
0
The Prodigal Son said:
The claim is the type of bad faith that discredits the anti Armstrong movement.
.

+1
Although discrediting the anti Armstrong movement a lot like
discrediting a bowel movement....I mean c'mon, SSDD.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
The Prodigal Son said:
You're saying because I'm from England I must be the same person as someone else with a totally different IP address? There are 70 million people in the UK.

Given your diminished mental capacity I would not expect you to know that you can get far more information from an IP address then just it's country of origin.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
The Prodigal Son said:
So - you spent the last hour and a half trying to find something practical that Armstrong has done for 'Cancer Awareness' .....and you found nothing.

Thanks for the update.
 
Jul 9, 2009
7,879
1,289
20,680
I found a picture which proves that Arbiter, BanPro Cycling, Great White, Prodigy, and Prodigal Son are not the same person. How could they all appear in a picture together if they were?









2iuw27p.jpg
 
Feb 24, 2010
34
0
0
Dr. Maserati said:
So - you spent the last hour and a half trying to find something practical that Armstrong has done for 'Cancer Awareness' .....and you found nothing.

Thanks for the update.

I haven't spent any time at all looking for the vast charity events, the auctions, the meetings with governments, the inspirational cancer story that has littered stories about his return. It's all on the record and everybody knows about it.

I can't believe you're still standing by your statement, but I suppose at this point we're just going to have to agree to disagree: you believe that a post on this thread has done more for cancer awareness over the last two years than Lance Armstrong.
 
Aug 3, 2009
3,217
1
13,485
Dr. Maserati said:
So - you spent the last hour and a half trying to find something practical that Armstrong has done for 'Cancer Awareness' .....and you found nothing.

Thanks for the update.

I told you guys, the TV dinners were ready and the cats needed to be fed.
 
Feb 24, 2010
34
0
0
Race Radio said:
Given your diminished mental capacity I would not expect you to know that you can get far more information from an IP address then just it's country of origin.

I don't mind the trolling, I just ignore it, but this appears like it maybe a threat. Perhaps the moderators should warn them.
 
May 26, 2009
4,114
0
0
The Prodigal Son said:
I haven't spent any time at all looking for the vast charity events, the auctions, the meetings with governments, the inspirational cancer story that has littered stories about his return.

Cue the music, that could be the tag line for the movie.
 
Feb 24, 2010
34
0
0
Dr. Maserati said:
Actually all you have done is prove that he was doing MORE for the cancer community before he came back.

Have you found any evidence to support your claim that this post on this thread has done more for cancer awareness since Armstrong's comeback? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, yet you're yet to produce any.

For the icon of cancer survivors to comeback at 37 was a huge inspiration to people. You're being remarkably churlish here. Millions of dollars were made for cancer.
 
Mar 18, 2009
2,442
0
0
The Prodigal Son said:
Millions of dollars were made for cancer.

Millions of dollars were made to line LA's pockets. Cancer was a distant consideration in LA's comeback. Lots was said about raising cancer awareness, but very little was done. Painfully little. And for someone as media savvy as LA, the silence about cancer awareness during his comeback year speaks volumes. Instead, LA made money of cancer. Furthermore, he is funnelling well-intentioned people's donations away from more worthy cancer causes, causes that actually contribute to fighting the disease and finding cures. While the LAF plays an undeniable and much needed role for individuals, it does nothing to combat the disease itself.
 
Jul 25, 2009
1,072
0
0
Meanwhile back on topic....despite Hog's evidence that LA has been paid a dime or two from LAF.... do we all agree that LA mostly profits from 'livestrong' indirectly through endorsments? Or is someone keen to keep arguing on the internet about it?

It's just that I'm bored and grouchy today and I feel like a scrap, but that tediously repetitive *** troll muppet is simply too fukcing stupid to provide any sport.

Edit: Just learned that a family member is terminally ill, no longer feel inspired to argue on internet.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
The Prodigal Son said:
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, yet you're yet to produce any.

-------- Millions of dollars were made for cancer.

Maybe you can follow your own advice and give us a link to that $200 million in 2009 claim of yours?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.